28 May 21
@earl-of-trumps saidThat’s because he is.
The jury is still out but, yes, when Trump suspected it, he was - *all together now*, a RACIST
Or a retard. You’re free to choose.
All science is based upon what is most likely and provable at any given time. As more evidence or proof appears, science’s view can change.
5 months ago almost all proof that I saw indictated bat to animal to human transmission.
Now... it’s still exactly the same. I’ve seen no proof to back it up, only speculation that 3 people in the lab were sick before covid was discovered. And as I posted earlier in this thread, there is ample evidence covid was spreading in Wuhan before December. So it wouldn’t be strange for a few lab workers to have contracted it. Although China has claimed that no lab workers have tested positive with antibodies (or something.. I ignored that mostly).
This lab theory has a few things in its favour, and the Chinese government’s hampering of the investigation doesn’t help put minds at rest.
The WHO team in it’s March report have said as much and stated clearly that a follow-up investigation is needed.
So, even though I think the bat to animal to human theory is, by far, the most plausable, I am open to proof either way.
Let investigations proceed.
However, I’m not entirely sure US intelligence services are the best men for the job...
28 May 21
@shavixmir - said
All science is based upon what is most likely and provable at any given time. As more evidence or proof appears, science’s view can change.
So please tell us, mister endowed one, what did American Intel tell Trump back in the day?
28 May 21
@earl-of-trumps saidHow should I know?
@shavixmir - said
All science is based upon what is most likely and provable at any given time. As more evidence or proof appears, science’s view can change.
So please tell us, mister endowed one, what did American Intel tell Trump back in the day?
28 May 21
@shavixmir saidlets start by china not allowing US scientist to investigate. WHO and china are working hand in hand, biden is covering for them.
How should I know?
28 May 21
@earl-of-trumps saidIt wouldn't have mattered. It would have gone in one ear and out the other.
@shavixmir - said
All science is based upon what is most likely and provable at any given time. As more evidence or proof appears, science’s view can change.
So please tell us, mister endowed one, what did American Intel tell Trump back in the day?
Trump was well known around the White House for not reading the reports that were placed in front of him anyways.
Probably.......because he was smarter than those giving him the reports. 😆
@mott-the-hoople saidYou’re so moronic I refer to Duchess’s answer.
lets start by china not allowing US scientist to investigate. WHO and china are working hand in hand, biden is covering for them.
28 May 21
@shavixmir saidyou're damm right you don't know.
How should I know?
so maybe it's the case that intel informed the POTUS that the virus started in China at the Wuhan labs.
28 May 21
@mghrn55 saidlol
It wouldn't have mattered. It would have gone in one ear and out the other.
Trump was well known around the White House for not reading the reports that were placed in front of him anyways.
Probably.......because he was smarter than those giving him the reports. 😆
He had to have *some* basis by which he banned flights coming in from China. I mean, he just
didn't pull that out of his arse. Intel knew, the POTUS was informed. and I think they may have
told POTUS it started in the labs, too.
29 May 21
@earl-of-trumps saidI actually believe that Trump pulled that out of his arse.
lol
He had to have *some* basis by which he banned flights coming in from China. I mean, he just
didn't pull that out of his arse. Intel knew, the POTUS was informed. and I think they may have
told POTUS it started in the labs, too.
29 May 21
You all need to stop confusing divegeester. He thinks anybody who debates this is conspiratorial and cannot possibly be in their right mind.
In other words, he thinks you are all out to get him. He cannot handle the cognitive dissonance. He was convinced that the fact checkers represent facts and this is already settled.
Even Biden is confusing him. He must be in on it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-57260009