Originally posted by PalynkaAh wait, if Canada's health care is better for say older mothers, but worse for younger mothers, it could be possible.
I'm not sure if I understand what you're saying...
Canada - 5.3
US - 6.8
Plug birth age distribution of Canada into US, (call it US*) then US* -> 5.4
Plug birth age distribution of US into Canada, (call it C*) then C* -> 7.06
Is it C*>US and US*>Canada that's bothering you? This difference could be due to different mortality rates per age. It's po ...[text shortened]... latively better than Canada with teenage births and vice-versa, but they have more of them).
Originally posted by zeeblebotPublications such as the NY Times can be very obtuse when doing so favors their world view.
http://townhall.com/columnists/LarryElder/2009/06/25/45_million_americans_--_who_are_those_guys_part_2?page=2
...
Elder: Ezekiel Emanuel, a medical adviser to the President (and brother of Rahm, the chief of staff), once told me, "Life expectancy is one of the dumbest ways to measure the quality of a nation's health care." Quality of medical care do ...[text shortened]... uences of unhealthy lifestyles, keeping our ranking from being even lower.
...
If a 25 year old man dies of a gun shot wound who would have otherwise lived until age 75, that is 50 years of life lost. That has the same effect on a nations life expectancy of 50 people each living one year less.
If life expectancy in the US is a year or two less than some other country, personally I remain unconvinced it shows any evidence of a weakness in health care.
Cancer survival rates in the US are higher than anywhere. In my mind, that's a better indicator of health care strength than overall life expectancy, although it is not conclusive.