Go back
Violence as a state tool.

Violence as a state tool.

Debates

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
14 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
They deliver because they know their contracts are enforcible by law. No judicial system functions without force as, at least, a last resort solution. At least I can't think of any.

One may imagine systems that would work without force for a majority of citizens, but will always be a number of people that need to be dealt by force if the number of individuals is large.
in the 50's a sociologist went to live among a jungle tribe in malaysia (?) and found they were not violent. i forget her name. maybe the tribe was the Selaks.

however, that tribe is contained and its existence suffered by a nation that employs violence, occasionally.

m

Banned from site.

Joined
04 Mar 04
Moves
2455
Clock
14 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
in the 50's a sociologist went to live among a jungle tribe in malaysia (?) and found they were not violent. i forget her name. maybe the tribe was the Selaks.

however, that tribe is contained and its existence suffered by a nation that employs violence, occasionally.
Maybe it was the Semai tribe . Googling Selak doesnt produce anything.

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
14 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moweut
Maybe it was the Semai tribe . Googling Selak doesnt produce anything.
now i remember, the sociologist was margaret mead.

are we part of your homework assignment?

m

Banned from site.

Joined
04 Mar 04
Moves
2455
Clock
14 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
now i remember, the sociologist was margaret mead.

are we part of your homework assignment?
Yes this my homework and i live it. Wikipedia is also authorative on ms mead. thanks

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
Clock
14 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
in the 50's a sociologist went to live among a jungle tribe in malaysia (?) and found they were not violent. i forget her name. maybe the tribe was the Selaks.

however, that tribe is contained and its existence suffered by a nation that employs violence, occasionally.
I specifically mentioned the importance of the size. I'm sure it's possible in smaller groups as long as they manage to keep isolated, which is no mean feat.

B

Joined
18 Nov 06
Moves
0
Clock
18 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

IC

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
28651
Clock
18 Nov 06
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Not you again? 😠

Bobla45

Joined
20 Oct 02
Moves
599979
Clock
18 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Stang, cant you die with a little dignity?

AThousandYoung
Chato de Shamrock

tinyurl.com/2s4b6bmx

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26926
Clock
18 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Suppose we had a completely peaceful society, with no violence.

Now suppose I pulled out a gun, or a knife, or a baseball bat, and killed someone I didn't like. Now there's violence in society.

How should society handle this?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.