18 Jan 07
Originally posted by SeitseDarn, that explains why you are so cute. Sigh, only the hot ones.
This is info only Bosse de Nage used to have, but since he disclosed
that part of my personal life, risking himself to break the TOS and
get banned, I will share it to eerybody: Mike and I are roommates.
đ
18 Jan 07
Originally posted by howardgeeWhile i can agree with howardgee's reasons my vote
I vote yes.
Simply because it is better to have the ignorant in the open and open to ridicule rather than pushed underground and made a martyr of.
Also, his insults were amusing!
No.
A while back there was a thread saying Chancre wanted to apologise or some such and i gave him the benefit of the doubt and even defended him until he showed his true colours and gave every one and me a verbal spray! He can go take a long flying leap at a rolling doughnut hole!
Shame on you if you fool me once, shame on me if you fool me twice.
Also Frenchqueen was a clan mate at the time, and he upset her, showing a lack of decency, let alone breaching the TOS.
18 Jan 07
Originally posted by lordhighgusThe majority for return is yes good work people
While i can agree with howardgee's reasons my vote
No.
A while back there was a thread saying Chancre wanted to apologise or some such and i gave him the benefit of the doubt and even defended him until he showed his true colours and gave every one and me a verbal spray! He can go take a long flying leap at a rolling doughnut hole!
Shame on you if ...[text shortened]... lan mate at the time, and he upset her, showing a lack of decency, let alone breaching the TOS.
19 Jan 07
1 edit
Originally posted by DoctorDaraThere's a difference between spirited discussion and a general tendency to personally abuse those you disagree with. I love discussions, but I don't actually see as many of them around here as I'd like.
The major reason I said yes was I'd rather a spirited discussion with someone I don't agree with than forced conformity.
Chancremechanic's ability to discuss was highly variable. Often he would start discussing, but frequently he would lose his temper over something and the discussion part would be over.
19 Jan 07
I honestly believe some of his writings provoked racial and cultural hatred of the kind that we do not need in this forum, but i believe that if he was chastised properly, that he could've made his point in a more (dare i say it) Internationally acceptable manner.
I'd have him back.
As a sidebar issue...I believe that him using his dead mother as a line not to cross after he insulted so many different people was pitiful. yadda yadda yadda something about glass houses.