07 Jun 12
Originally posted by whodeyI definitely wouldn't put it past you to be defecating in public on cars.
Speaking of class, at least I never stormed the White House when Obama won and refused to leave and then defecated in public on cars and tried to have him recalled........even though I was tempted to do these things and more!! 😛
07 Jun 12
Originally posted by whodeyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_protests#Reports_of_abusive_behavior
Well I was going to thank Obama and all of his liberal cronies for the win, but because I have such class I held back these sentiments.
Speaking of class, at least I never stormed the White House when Obama won and refused to leave and then defecated in public on cars and tried to have him recalled........even though I was tempted to do these things and more!! 😛
12 Jun 12
Originally posted by rwingettI guess I can't help my retardation, but somehow I have always been more threatened by government excesses, than by those of even the largest corporations.
Don't be a retard.
Local governments can spend double what people make for the same work in the private sector. If we vote the bums out, they come back with recall elections. If Bill Gates wants me to use Windows, he has to make a better product. Microsoft employees can't force money out of my pocket, in the manner that public sector union workers can and do.
12 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by normbenign*Yawn* So you really don't have a point to make do you?
A plan involving more than one person is a conspiracy.
Usually when someone says conspiracy they mean something along the lines of 911 truthers claims. Something I never even came close to claiming.
Walker has expressed his plans in a taped conversation with one of his rich donors that I imagine he didn't know was being taped.
I didn't express any shady undefined conspiracy and if you think I did then you should make a better attempt at somehow pointing it out.
12 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by PsychoPawnOnly if the chess that kevcvs57 wants to play or the lunch you intend to eat is illegal or going to cause injury or loss in a premeditated way to a third party.
Apparently. I am in an ongoing conspiracy currently with my friend to go get something for lunch on Friday.
12 Jun 12
Originally posted by FMFDon't you know? "A plan involving more than one person is a conspiracy." - so says Norm and if he says it then it must be true.
Only if the chess that kevcvs57 wants to play or the lunch you intend to eat is illegal or going to cause injury or loss in a premeditated way to a third party.
There's nothing in that definition that says it must be illegal or it is going to cause injury or loss at all.
12 Jun 12
Originally posted by PsychoPawnBe that as it may, but if normbenign is using "conspiracy" as hyperbole - i.e. coordination between people to do something he disagrees with - then that is for him and for us to bear in mind.
There's nothing in that definition that says it must be illegal or it is going to cause injury or loss at all.
12 Jun 12
Originally posted by FMFThank you, I thought someone would add the necessary element. Scott Walker's policies have done no harm to his States voters, on the whole his administration has made Wisconsin a better place, sound of budget, lower unemployment, and the prospect of lower taxation. Nothing criminal in any of that, or anything harmful either.
Only if the chess that kevcvs57 wants to play or the lunch you intend to eat is illegal or going to cause injury or loss in a premeditated way to a third party.