@mott-the-hoople saidmth is a proud boy
go somewhere and masturbate...too much pressure on you brain right now.
masturbates once a month
alone
10 Nov 20
@shavixmir said"The monitors were able to follow campaigning events and the voting itself on 3 November in several locations, including the key battleground states of Georgia and Michigan."
From the BBC:
International monitors praise US election
A team of international monitors from the Organization of American States (OAS) has praised the conduct of the US election.
The delegation - which had 28 experts and observers from 13 countries - said in its preliminary report: "While the environment of the elections was competitive and fraught, the ability of v ...[text shortened]... s there, responding to President Trump's claims that the Democrats had tried to steal the elections.
Did they monitor Antrim County MI? As I recall "the monitors" did not discover republican votes being flipped to democrats because of human error.
Were the "monitors" too busy eating donuts to do their job?
10 Nov 20
@no1marauder saidCongress?
If Congress had wanted to wait until the Electors cast their ballots before the provisions of the PTA became effective, they would have said so.
They didn't and there is no reasonable interpretation that would suggest so.
What does congress have to do with the electors?
What are you talking about?
10 Nov 20
@mott-the-hoople saidSorry, there is nothing in the Presidential Transition Act requiring the losing candidates to concede. It would be an absurdity to allow a sore loser to defeat the will of Congress to have an orderly transition by a simple refusal to accept apparent defeat.
oh...I though the opposing party had to concede...oh thats right, they do...you are being a weasel again.
@metal-brain saidRead the law. I already provided the text on the last page.
Congress?
What does congress have to do with the electors?
What are you talking about?
EDIT: To remind you:
""The terms "President-elect" and "Vice-President-elect" as used in this Act shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the office of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained by the Administrator following the general elections held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg153.pdf Section 3(c)
@metal-brain saidNo votes were "flipped". There was an error in tabulation by a Republican County Clerk that was quickly discovered and corrected.
"The monitors were able to follow campaigning events and the voting itself on 3 November in several locations, including the key battleground states of Georgia and Michigan."
Did they monitor Antrim County MI? As I recall "the monitors" did not discover republican votes being flipped to democrats because of human error.
Were the "monitors" too busy eating donuts to do their job?
10 Nov 20
@no1marauder saidCongress IS the Electoral College.
If Congress had wanted to wait until the Electors cast their ballots before the provisions of the PTA became effective, they would have said so.
My god you are ignorant.
Are you the one that claims to be a lawyer. or is that someone else?
10 Nov 20
@no1marauder saidBut that has already happened. The GSA denied Biden transition information and money. An orderly transition has already been thwarted by DJT.
Sorry, there is nothing in the Presidential Transition Act requiring the losing candidates to concede. It would be an absurdity to allow a sore loser to defeat the will of Congress to have an orderly transition by a simple refusal to accept apparent defeat.
Do you know why Biden merely threatened to take legal action against the GSA and never did? Because Biden has no legal ground to stand on, that is why. He is not the president elect and will not be until Dec. 14 at the soonest.....unless Trump decides to concede.
During Bush v. Gore debacle Al Gore had nothing from the GSA either. Do you know why? Because he was not the president elect.
Have you accepted these facts yet? The news media wants you to think Biden won. That way even if Trump wins in the end you will think he stole the election. And the divide and conquer tactic is taken to a new level.
It is kind of like Star Wars. Embrace your hate for one another.....mwaahahaha!
10 Nov 20
@no1marauder saidVotes were flipped. That is how it was discovered!
No votes were "flipped". There was an error in tabulation by a Republican County Clerk that was quickly discovered and corrected.
You seem to be in denial of basic facts. You can explain why they were flipped and how it was an accident all you want. Republican votes were flipped to democrat votes so much it was obvious something was wrong. That is how it was discovered.
Once again, just because it was obvious and discovered in one county does not mean it was discovered in all counties. This justifies a recount in Michigan. A judge ruled against it anyway? Was he a democrat? You are the partisan guru here. You should know.
10 Nov 20
@no1marauder saidThat proves nothing.
Read the law. I already provided the text on the last page.
EDIT: To remind you:
""The terms "President-elect" and "Vice-President-elect" as used in this Act shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the office of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained by the Administrator following the general elections held to determ ...[text shortened]... ons 1 and 2.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg153.pdf Section 3(c)
Why do some states have mandatory recounts when the election is very close? There is a reason. What is it?
@metal-brain saidYou're ridiculous.
But that has already happened. The GSA denied Biden transition information and money. An orderly transition has already been thwarted by DJT.
Do you know why Biden merely threatened to take legal action against the GSA and never did? Because Biden has no legal ground to stand on, that is why. He is not the president elect and will not be until Dec. 14 at the soonest.. ...[text shortened]... n to a new level.
It is kind of like Star Wars. Embrace your hate for one another.....mwaahahaha!
Biden team is considering legal action; that they haven't actually taken it since yesterday proves absolutely nothing. They're probably in negotiation with the GSA hoping to avoid it. Not everyone has the patience of a five year old like yourself.
There was no apparent winner in 2000 for about a month; there were only a few hundred votes separating the two main candidates in the decisive State. By contrast, Biden is just as much, if not more, the apparent winner than Trump was in 2016 - he leads in States that get him to exactly the same amount of EC votes and his leads are bigger in the decisive States.
It is you who are refusing to accept facts. And apparently refusing to read the applicable statute.
@no1marauder saidWhy do you want an apparent winner now? Why is it so important? We have until Jan. 20th or something like that. What is your hurry?
You're ridiculous.
Biden team is considering legal action; that they haven't actually taken it since yesterday proves absolutely nothing. They're probably in negotiation with the GSA hoping to avoid it. Not everyone has the patience of a five year old like yourself.
There was no apparent winner in 2000 for about a month; there were only a few hundred votes separatin ...[text shortened]...
It is you who are refusing to accept facts. And apparently refusing to read the applicable statute.
If Biden really wants unity like he said, why doesn't he encourage recounts to reaffirm his legitimacy as POTUS? Do you want him to go through the same thing Trump did for 4 years? After all, if Trump is so wrong why is Biden not eager to prove it to benefit himself?
You don't want to be talking about Electiongate for the next 4 years, do you?
"Biden team is considering legal action"
LOL!
Didn't you claim the BSA was run by some unreasonable partisan hack or something along those lines? Is Biden waiting for an apology from this unreasonable partisan hack? LOL!!!
Stop pretending you do not know better. Biden will not sue because he has no case. Why do you think Trump took legal action to stop certification of the vote in certain states? It is not over and it never was.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/dont-fall-psyop-biden-not-officially-president-elect-at-least-not-yet/5728913