Originally posted by @metal-brainI married my stepsister. Does that count? She was hot. Could not help myself.
...they will inbreed for money.
http://discovermagazine.com/2003/aug/featkiss
Are the Rothschild women different than women in general?
30 Aug 18
Originally posted by @kquinn909Nope, that doesn't count.
I married my stepsister. Does that count? She was hot. Could not help myself.
30 Aug 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainThis is absurd. Just because the Rothschild women engaged in this practice, you can't honestly think women in general do as well. Women are no more or less greedy than men are.
...they will inbreed for money.
http://discovermagazine.com/2003/aug/featkiss
Are the Rothschild women different than women in general?
30 Aug 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainThe Spanish royal family did the same thing. Carlos I, Holy Roman Emperor was incredibly inbred. That's one of many factors that led to the fall of the Spanish Empire.
...they will inbreed for money.
http://discovermagazine.com/2003/aug/featkiss
Are the Rothschild women different than women in general?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_V,_Holy_Roman_Emperor
30 Aug 18
Originally posted by @mchillIt depends on how you look at it. Men are success objects to women as much as women are sex objects to men. Both sexes are shallow in this regard and it is human nature.
This is absurd. Just because the Rothschild women engaged in this practice, you can't honestly think women in general do as well. Women are no more or less greedy than men are.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/rich-women-like-rich-men-and-rich-men-like-slender-women-2015-09-28
For a woman to seek a good provider made sense centuries ago. It increased the chances of survival and reproduction. In these modern times of plenty and social programs to help the poor that is not all that necessary, but human nature does not adapt that fast. Men are attracted to the (mostly visual) average characteristics of women with little regard of success. I could care less what job a woman has as long as she is attractive and not a crazy woman. Women seem very interested in a man's occupation, even if they have lots of money and it seemingly doesn't matter. Human nature cannot turn itself off like a light switch.
Since women generally seek out men with money, I could argue that it is greed. I'll admit it is more complicated than that from an evolutionary standpoint, but success today means money, right?
30 Aug 18
Originally posted by @athousandyoungWas the inbreeding too extensive leading to undesirable characteristics in the gene pool?
The Spanish royal family did the same thing. Carlos I, Holy Roman Emperor was incredibly inbred. That's one of many factors that led to the fall of the Spanish Empire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_V,_Holy_Roman_Emperor
Originally posted by @metal-brainYes to an extreme degree.
Was the inbreeding too extensive leading to undesirable characteristics in the gene pool?
https://blog.23andme.com/ancestry/the-end-of-a-dynasty-how-inbreeding-doomed-the-house-of-habsburg/
But the final Habspurg king of Spain, Charles II, was perhaps the most unfortunate result of these unions. Also know as “El Hechizado” (“The Hexed&rdquo😉, Charles was severely deformed. The so-called “Habsburg Lip”, a form of mandibular prognathism often seen among members of the Habsburg Dynasty, was so pronounced in Charles’ case that it was difficult for him to speak. An enlarged tongue, gastrointestinal problems, mental retardation, and possible growth problems meant that Charles was raised almost as an infant until the age of 10. Even as he grew older, he was never able to govern effectively. His rule saw the rapid decline of the Empire, only exacerbated by his death in 1700.
Originally posted by @metal-brainYou are a simpleton who spends way too much time considering your own opinions, putting yourself out of touch with others'.
It depends on how you look at it. Men are success objects to women as much as women are sex objects to men. Both sexes are shallow in this regard and it is human nature.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/rich-women-like-rich-men-and-rich-men-like-slender-women-2015-09-28
For a woman to seek a good provider made sense centuries ago. It increased th ...[text shortened]... ore complicated than that from an evolutionary standpoint, but success today means money, right?
The end result is that you end up blurring the line between your opinion and fact.
01 Sep 18
Originally posted by @suzianneAre claiming the Rothschild women did not inbreed for money? If not, you are out of touch with reality.
You are a simpleton who spends way too much time considering your own opinions, putting yourself out of touch with others'.
The end result is that you end up blurring the line between your opinion and fact.
01 Sep 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainNo, I am not claiming that, moron.
Are claiming the Rothschild women did not inbreed for money? If not, you are out of touch with reality.
I'm calling out your insane assertion that what one privileged family did is what ALL women do, which is what you are saying. You simply made that up.
01 Sep 18
Originally posted by @suzianneNope. I'm trying to get someone to say the Rothschild women are unusually greedy compared to the general population. Now that you have done that I can reveal the real reason I created this thread.
No, I am not claiming that, moron.
I'm calling out your insane assertion that what one privileged family did is what ALL women do, which is what you are saying. You simply made that up.
Inbreeding helps to accentuate certain characteristics in the gene pool when inbreeding takes place for multiple generations. In the case of the Rothschild family it is greed and apathy. They started out as sociopaths, but after inbreeding starting with the women's greed it progressed to a gene pool of evil psychopaths.
Jeff Bezos is not the wealthiest person in the world as many of you think. The Rothschild family has hid their wealth from the public and they are the wealthiest people in the world. That is why Carl Levin could not pass legislation that would put a name on shell corporations to prevent money laundering and the intentional hiding of money. The Rothschilds and Rockefellers want to keep it that way. They don't want you to know how much wealth they have. You would hate them if you did.
Imperialism is an evil game. We all play the game of imperialism, but it is a game and nothing more. People don't actually have their lives sacrificed as pawns in the game of chess. Imperialism is just another form of organized crime and it takes a lot of apathy and greed to stomach it. That is why the Rothschild family is so powerful. They don't let human lives get in the way of their perverse lust for power. Could you win a chess game by not sacrificing pawns when necessary?