Go back
You have to admit....

You have to admit....

Debates

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
19 Oct 20
1 edit

@no1marauder said
If someone had wrote "Christmas is July 4th" correcting them by writing "Christmas is December 25th" would be relevant.

Since Earl wrote "The constitution establishes individual rights for all citizens, not societal rights" correcting him with my post is relevant and apparently necessary.
Yes, of course, social rights (I was thrown by societal) are quite an issue, not enough teeth to ramble about.

Did you see my latest analogy above, with Suzianne? no one ever raves about my analogies

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20433
Clock
19 Oct 20

@averagejoe1 said
Uh oh, Trump is MAKING MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Suzianne hates people making money. And Suzy is one of those who cannot tell us what Fair Share is, or how much more the 1% should pay in taxes, among other things. Suzy wants us all to get $35/month from the government, which is the amount received by Cubans. Actually, she can justify that by saying we would all be equal. Fun indeed.
What suzianne and all leftists have to learn is, if there is no way to make money in
business, there are no businesses, no farms etc. That means there are no jobs and no
revenue for government to tax. Which means, of course, no government and a starving population.

Think they will ever get WOKE, AJ? All they have to do is review what was done
in Venezuela to destroy the economy,, which ended up crippling government.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
19 Oct 20

@earl-of-trumps said
What suzianne and all leftists have to learn is, if there is no way to make money in
business, there are no businesses, no farms etc. That means there are no jobs and no
revenue for government to tax. Which means, of course, no government and a starving population.

Think they will ever get WOKE, AJ? All they have to do is review what was done
in Venezuela to destroy the economy,, which ended up crippling government.
They hear it, but they don’t. Will I still be able to have my computer, will somebody (else) pay everyone to provide our needs...??? Ohhh,it is all so confusing. I just hope I can get 22 varieties of cornflakes. Oh, did the government invent cornflakes or was it an individual ?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Oct 20
1 edit

@earl-of-trumps said
What suzianne and all leftists have to learn is, if there is no way to make money in
business, there are no businesses, no farms etc. That means there are no jobs and no
revenue for government to tax. Which means, of course, no government and a starving population.

Think they will ever get WOKE, AJ? All they have to do is review what was done
in Venezuela to destroy the economy,, which ended up crippling government.
And what hysterical right wingers need to learn is that sufficiently robust social welfare policies can be enacted without ruining the economy as most "advanced" nations have figured out by now.

Or do you think there are "no jobs and businesses" in say, Germany?

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
19 Oct 20
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Moobus shows a picture and story about Ivanka nailing a business deal for her family's business. I did not see any impropriety in the story, nor in the picture (No threats like Joe Biden does). So, so much for his weak meaningless post.

Moonbus....Are you suggesting that Trump not have business transactions or make money while President? I think Truman had a hat sho ...[text shortened]... leader Trump. Have you seen his accomplishments,,,,yes, I think I would sign on to any idea he has.
Using the office of the president for personal financial gain is a clear violation of the “no emoluments “ clause. That you don’t see any impropriety or conflict of interest there is no surprise.i guess you saw no impropriety in it when Trump proposed holding a diplomatic conference at one of his golf resorts either.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
19 Oct 20

@moonbus said
Using the office of the president for personal financial gain is a clear violation of the “no emoluments “ clause. That you don’t see any impropriety or conflict of interest there is no surprise.
Really. So when Ivanka makes a deal, in the name of trump entities, should she be required to disguise herself, use another (fraudulent) name, or hire a straw man.......all of which will still make Trump money? What if Trump has a huge family turnip farm.....how you think that should be handled?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
19 Oct 20

@no1marauder said
And what hysterical right wingers need to learn is that sufficiently robust social welfare policies can be enacted without ruining the economy as most "advanced" nations have figured out by now.

Or do you think there are "no jobs and businesses" in say, Germany?
I agree. We are robust, we can decide to care for the 40 million who are basically impoverished. That gets my vote. Let’s do it, then everyone else get to work! Govt protects us from Korea’s missles, protects us at the FDA and Osha, and FAA, FBI and similar agencies, then get out of our lives. Most libs here want Govt IN their lives. Do you?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
19 Oct 20
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Really. So when Ivanka makes a deal, in the name of trump entities, should she be required to disguise herself, use another (fraudulent) name, or hire a straw man.......all of which will still make Trump money? What if Trump has a huge family turnip farm.....how you think that should be handled?
The way Jimmy Carter handled his peanut farm.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
20 Oct 20

@athousandyoung said
The way Jimmy Carter handled his peanut farm.
Fair enough. Let's say Jimmy also owned hotels all over the world, can you come back with an answer on that, Thousand????????? We are on the same page! I love it. Oh, and let's say Jimmy had 2 casinos in vegas and 1 in Reno. So, how to handle all that.?????????????????????

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
20 Oct 20

@earl-of-trumps said
@kevcvs57 - to derail Biden’s campaign message of unity

LOL! Priceless. the "inclusion" party. Uh huh.
Meanwhile, BLM/antifa, the paramilitary wing of the Democratic Party, routinely
burn the American flag and attack people who fly it proudly.

The Democrat party has for along time been pitting rich against poor, black
against white, women against men. That is how they roll.

"Unity" - my ass.
Nice bunch of lies earl you are soooo trumpian lately anyone would think there’s an election coming.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
20 Oct 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
You see, you are spewing liberal-eze. If my neighbor is a very bad man (corrupt) and is trying to find out something about my son to get my son in trouble, to cause him grief because of something he has done, good or bad, I am naturally going to tell him I want him to stop. Are you with me so far, this is real complicated.

So, Suzianne, I know the bad neighbor's boss ...[text shortened]... lly bad guy, he stole the church collection last Sunday.

Tell us Suzianne, we can learn from you.
But what if this "very bad man" was ripping off citizens, making himself rich, and you are in a position of public trust, you know, a guardian of the common good, then you'd want to get him out of office so that he quits overstepping his office to enrich himself, and this has been brought to your attention by others he's screwed over, THEN you talk to his boss (who may be corrupt himself) and do what you can to do what is right. You're the one making this complicated by introducing factors which have nothing to do with the situation.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
20 Oct 20
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Fair enough. Let's say Jimmy also owned hotels all over the world, can you come back with an answer on that, Thousand????????? We are on the same page! I love it. Oh, and let's say Jimmy had 2 casinos in vegas and 1 in Reno. So, how to handle all that.?????????????????????
Same as when David Packard was appointed to a federal post which might potentially have netted HP large government contracts. His assets were put into a blind trust and managed by a non-partisan organization over which he had no influence.

That is the only way to prevent kleptocrats, like the Trumps, from using public office for self-enrichment. Trump is in office to serve the public, not to make money. As a public servant, he gets a salary; if that isn't enough for him, he should resign and go back to bankrupting his own businesses.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
20 Oct 20

@earl-of-trumps said
What suzianne and all leftists have to learn is, if there is no way to make money in
business, there are no businesses, no farms etc. That means there are no jobs and no
revenue for government to tax. Which means, of course, no government and a starving population.

Think they will ever get WOKE, AJ? All they have to do is review what was done
in Venezuela to destroy the economy,, which ended up crippling government.
Corporations were taxed by 90% during WW2.

And guess what? They STILL made money hand over fist. One can only imagine what they're making now, with their license to rip off everyone (in many ways) granted to them by Republicans.

The only way corporations go broke is if their owners decide that if they're not going to become OBSCENELY rich by screwing the American people, then screw it, they'll just go bankrupt (again, screwing their employees), and start another corp. with all the cash they absconded with when they left. A new corp., without all the tax baggage of the old one.

Cry me a river if we tax you more than you want, and cut into your precious massive profits. You got rich by fiscally raping Americans, then you can pay your fair share back to America.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
20 Oct 20

@averagejoe1 said
Uh oh, Trump is MAKING MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Suzianne hates people making money. And Suzy is one of those who cannot tell us what Fair Share is, or how much more the 1% should pay in taxes, among other things. Suzy wants us all to get $35/month from the government, which is the amount received by Cubans. Actually, she can justify that by saying we would all be equal. Fun indeed.
Public servants should not be using their office to make money, beyond whatever salary they are paid for public service. Furthermore, public servants should not endorse products (remember the canned beans?) This is so elementary to principles of good governance, it is a wonder to me that someone has to explain it to you.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
20 Oct 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
I agree. We are robust, we can decide to care for the 40 million who are basically impoverished. That gets my vote. Let’s do it, then everyone else get to work! Govt protects us from Korea’s missles, protects us at the FDA and Osha, and FAA, FBI and similar agencies, then get out of our lives. Most libs here want Govt IN their lives. Do you?
You DO know that Americans (average Americans, like you, not making nearly as much as you) work at those agencies don't you?

And again, take a look at the Preamble to the Constitution again. These things are what those average Americans are doing for you. Taking care of Americans who have fallen through the cracks. Trump has rendered almost every agency unable to do this job and has turned government into a servant of the Corporation, instead of a servant of the People.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.