- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
@metal-brain saidI could be wrong, but didn't Duchess64 get a perma-ban for excessively copying and pasting articles and links in these forums?
@shavixmir
"humans are now hack-able animals"
https://www.dcclothesline.com/2022/11/29/the-great-reset-how-world-governments-are-playing-god-with-global-depopulation/
Watch 3rd video in this link. He said that and a lot more. Is Harari right or wrong? If he is wrong, why is he allowed to say that at the WEF?
Yuval Noah Harari is a lead advisor for Klaus Schwab. ...[text shortened]... g people what they have planned for you. Watch the video of them saying it. I am not making this up.
13 Dec 22
@Woofwoof
I have never heard that. Duchess was unliked by a lot of people here. I think people complained about her a lot and was on thin ice and violated guidelines. I don't know that for sure. I don't know what guideline she violated or even if she did violate guidelines. I once got banned for about a month for speaking out against the gene vaccines and that was not even a stated violation of guidelines, so it is possible the site moderators simply didn't like her style of berating other posters here. Harari is not making up this stuff. DARPA has been working on a brain to digital interface. It is not sci fi nonsense.
https://www.electronicproducts.com/darpa-developing-brain-to-digital-neural-interface/
@metal-brain saidCould you quote to where Harari says that "They are selectively breeding people to be graphene tolerant."?
@Woofwoof
I have never heard that. Duchess was unliked by a lot of people here. I think people complained about her a lot and was on thin ice and violated guidelines. I don't know that for sure. I don't know what guideline she violated or even if she did violate guidelines. I once got banned for about a month for speaking out against the gene vaccines and that was not ev ...[text shortened]... nonsense.
https://www.electronicproducts.com/darpa-developing-brain-to-digital-neural-interface/
Thanks in advance.
13 Dec 22
@no1marauder saidI didn't say that he did. Are you claiming there is not graphene oxide in the gene vaccines? Are you claiming graphene oxide is safe in the human body?
Could you quote to where Harari says that "They are selectively breeding people to be graphene tolerant."?
Thanks in advance.
They already selectively bred lab rats to be graphene tolerant. I am not even claiming that was their goal, but that was the result. Mass injections of graphene oxide into people will have the same result. Common sense.
If you deny there is graphene oxide in the gene vaccines I am willing to bet you that you are wrong. Eventually they will admit there.is graphene oxide in the gene vaccines. They will say they put in in there to serve as an adjuvant and the amount is small (a lie).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32531395/
Then you will go along with it and say "no conspiracy because it is an adjuvant like other poisonous adjuvants in very small amounts" and all of those fake fact checkers who lied and said there was "no graphene oxide" in the gene vaccines will be forgotten by you. Just another mistake that doesn't matter. Oh, that's right, it was a lie. No biggy, all is forgiven. Just another of a string of lies from Big Pharma. That is the new normal. Lies don't matter anymore. Move along. Right?
@metal-brain saidThere is no graphene oxide in the COVID vaccines. https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/there-is-no-conclusive-evidence-that-the-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-contains-graphene-oxide/
I didn't say that he did. Are you claiming there is not graphene oxide in the gene vaccines? Are you claiming graphene oxide is safe in the human body?
They already selectively bred lab rats to be graphene tolerant. I am not even claiming that was their goal, but that was the result. Mass injections of graphene oxide into people will have the same result. Common sense. ...[text shortened]... tring of lies from Big Pharma. That is the new normal. Lies don't matter anymore. Move along. Right?
13 Dec 22
@no1marauder saidDo you care to make a bet on it? Pfizer has not disclosed all of the ingredients in their gene vaccine. Remember when you claimed the gene vaccine was not a gene vaccine using gene therapy technology? Remember when you claimed the SARS2 virus was not genetically engineered in a lab?
There is no graphene oxide in the COVID vaccines. https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/there-is-no-conclusive-evidence-that-the-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-contains-graphene-oxide/
Your track record is lousy and you want people to think I am wrong despite you being proven wrong countless times? LOL!
Do you really want to go down this road of your failure after failure?
@metal-brain saidThe vaccines aren't "gene vaccines".
Do you care to make a bet on it? Pfizer has not disclosed all of the ingredients in their gene vaccine. Remember when you claimed the gene vaccine was not a gene vaccine using gene therapy technology? Remember when you claimed the SARS2 virus was not genetically engineered in a lab?
Your track record is lousy and you want people to think I am wrong despite you being p ...[text shortened]... wrong countless times? LOL!
Do you really want to go down this road of your failure after failure?
There's no conclusive evidence that SARS2 was "genetically engineered in a lab"; the most likely explanation is still a natural mutation. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/origins-of-sars-cov-2
Just because you talk yourself into believing you have stumbled upon the Ultimate Truth by reading zerohedge and other crank sites and by watching videos made by loons in their basement doesn't mean that you're not dead wrong and a deranged nut.
13 Dec 22
@no1marauder saidLOL!
The vaccines aren't "gene vaccines".
There's no conclusive evidence that SARS2 was "genetically engineered in a lab"; the most likely explanation is still a natural mutation. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/origins-of-sars-cov-2
Just because you talk yourself into believing you have stumbled upon the Ultimate Truth by reading zerohedge and other crank sites and by ...[text shortened]... g videos made by loons in their basement doesn't mean that you're not dead wrong and a deranged nut.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/
What is the title of the article from that government link?
@metal-brain saidYou made claims like the ones debunked here:
LOL!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/
What is the title of the article from that government link?
"Reuters has previously debunked claims that mRNA vaccines alter recipients’ DNA (here) While these types of vaccines do involve the injection of a small part of the virus’s genetic code to stimulate immune response in a patient without an infection (here) in contrast to the more widespread “conventional” vaccines (here) which use a whole pathogen or fragment, the mRNA from the vaccine does not alter the recipient’s DNA, is broken down shortly after vaccination and does not stay in the body (here)."
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-genetic/fact-check-genetic-materials-from-mrna-vaccines-do-not-multiply-in-your-body-forever-idUSKBN29I30V
You were wrong.
14 Dec 22
2 edits
@no1marauder saidWhy do you believe so called fact checkers? They are nothing more than opinion pieces which I have proven again and again.
You made claims like the ones debunked here:
"Reuters has previously debunked claims that mRNA vaccines alter recipients’ DNA (here) While these types of vaccines do involve the injection of a small part of the virus’s genetic code to stimulate immune response in a patient without an infection (here) in contrast to the more widespread “conventional” vaccines (here) whi ...[text shortened]... c-materials-from-mrna-vaccines-do-not-multiply-in-your-body-forever-idUSKBN29I30V
You were wrong.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-psychology-of-fact-checking1/
Gene therapy does not have to change DNA and even if it did there is no proof mRNA vaccines don't change DNA.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/
What is the title of the article from this government link? Answer the question!
24 Dec 22
@no1marauder saidThere is no conclusive evidence it is completely natural either. You have a missing link. Even your hero Fauci admits it may have come from a lab.
The vaccines aren't "gene vaccines".
There's no conclusive evidence that SARS2 was "genetically engineered in a lab"; the most likely explanation is still a natural mutation. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/origins-of-sars-cov-2
Just because you talk yourself into believing you have stumbled upon the Ultimate Truth by reading zerohedge and other crank sites and by ...[text shortened]... g videos made by loons in their basement doesn't mean that you're not dead wrong and a deranged nut.
https://nypost.com/2021/05/11/fauci-admits-covid-19-could-have-come-from-wuhan-lab-butts-heads-with-rand-paul/
The WHO acknowledges it could have come from a lab.
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-world-news-health-science-coronavirus-pandemic-c0c594f9060f676c0ea48c2d1c69daec
Senior Biden administration officials said a lab leak was just as likely.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/16/politics/biden-intel-review-covid-origins/index.html
Just admit you were mislead by fake fact checkers who are known to plagiarize each other's misinformation.
24 Dec 22
1 edit
@no1marauder saidIn a laboratory setting working with I think liver cells in a petri dish scientists managed to integrate mRNA into the cells' genome via a retrotransposon called LINE1 which was naturally in the cells' DNA already. So it is theoretically possible.
You made claims like the ones debunked here:
"Reuters has previously debunked claims that mRNA vaccines alter recipients’ DNA (here) While these types of vaccines do involve the injection of a small part of the virus’s genetic code to stimulate immune response in a patient without an infection (here) in contrast to the more widespread “conventional” vaccines (here) whi ...[text shortened]... c-materials-from-mrna-vaccines-do-not-multiply-in-your-body-forever-idUSKBN29I30V
You were wrong.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958444/
we found that DNA copies of SARS-CoV-2 sequences can be integrated into the genome of infected human cells. We found target site duplications flanking the viral sequences and consensus LINE1 endonuclease recognition sequences at the integration sites, consistent with a LINE1 retrotransposon-mediated, target-primed reverse transcription and retroposition mechanism.
24 Dec 22
@no1marauder saidmRNA is a gene and therefore these vaccines are indeed gene vaccines though this sounds scarier than it is.
The vaccines aren't "gene vaccines".
There's no conclusive evidence that SARS2 was "genetically engineered in a lab"; the most likely explanation is still a natural mutation. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/origins-of-sars-cov-2
Just because you talk yourself into believing you have stumbled upon the Ultimate Truth by reading zerohedge and other crank sites and by ...[text shortened]... g videos made by loons in their basement doesn't mean that you're not dead wrong and a deranged nut.
24 Dec 22
@woofwoof saidI believe she got permabanned for making too many upsetting posts about rape.
I could be wrong, but didn't Duchess64 get a perma-ban for excessively copying and pasting articles and links in these forums?
25 Dec 22
@athousandyoung saidThere is nothing wrong with talking about rape. Some women accused Danny Masterson of rape. People are allowed to talk about rape allegations. Nothing taboo about that. I might even create a thread about it so people can debate over his innocence or guilt.
I believe she got permabanned for making too many upsetting posts about rape.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/30/entertainment/danny-masterson-mistrial/index.html
How does someone bring up rape in an "upsetting" way?