- Joined
- 10 Dec 06
- Moves
- 8528
@earl-of-trumps saidYeah, he's no dummy. That's why the likes of kevcvs57, shav, ect... are literally afraid to hear him.
Articulate and funny guy. He said at one point, "Yeah, I'm still black", as he
examined his arms, "But I'll have to check with Joe Biden" - or something like that
[thumbs-up] 😆
@earl-of-trumps saidLet me correct that, you called me a Hitler fan boy.
@kevcvs57 But like a true conservative poster you chose to wilfully misrepresent another poster
You hypocrite. You just called me a nazi in another thread. Liar.
Oh, the hypocrisy. Your people are scary nazi
One of my Facebook friends is a black British fellow as well. We met through our Christianity.
He describes his position as against Black Lives Matter the organization, and for the statement black lives matter. He strongly believes that whites have not properly considered the plight of black people, and that they should, but it is also something that we will have to do a lot to learn about and get on board with to ever be able to do so, and he can't really blame whites for not understanding the situation because they are so distant -- this is a pretty standard and daming position towards whites. I imagine it is to the left of Zuby.
Yet, he is against BLM the organization and the broader leftist movement because he sees it as clearly far leftist and anti-Christian in character.
His child is also half-white -- and he does not believe in any form of racial nationalism.
I found this position to be unlike my own... but nonetheless, it was agreeable in its nuance and moderation.
@Philokalia Yet, he is against BLM the organization and the broader leftist movement because he sees it as clearly far leftist and anti-Christian in character.
And in my opinion he is correct. And not just anti-Christian, - anti-ANY religion.
Wait until the various religious communities get WOKE. Uh huh.
BTW, I have a talk show on right now. The head of BLM has met Maduro of
Venezuela and has invited him to come to Chicago. How cool is that!!
@earl-of-trumps saidBeautiful propaganda piece for the President to bring out in October if he so chooses.
BTW, I have a talk show on right now. The head of BLM has met Maduro of
Venezuela and has invited him to come to Chicago. How cool is that!!
And who would blame him?
@joe-shmo said“ No you haven't!
"As mentioned above I’d already explained my stance."
No you haven't!
Where in this thread have you "clarified" how you pre-judged his speech to be incoherent rambling?
"If the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarise it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence then it’s probably not worth watching." kevcvs57 - You had not watched it at the point of this reply, so how did you make that judgement?
Where in this thread have you "clarified" how you pre-judged his speech to be incoherent rambling?”
kevcvs57 page 1
“ If the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarise it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence then it’s probably not worth watching.”
Are we going to have to wait for people like you to literally stumble over the truth .
- Joined
- 10 Dec 06
- Moves
- 8528
@kevcvs57 saidYou keep failing to understand that the statement you keep alluding to is the pre-judgement itself, not the explanation for pre judgment!
“ No you haven't!
Where in this thread have you "clarified" how you pre-judged his speech to be incoherent rambling?”
kevcvs57 page 1
“ If the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarise it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence then it’s probably not worth watching.”
Are we going to have to wait for people like you to literally stumble over the truth .
kevcvs57 page 1
“ If the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarise it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence then it’s probably not worth watching.”
You inferred I could not summarize it because it was "rambling and incoherent speech". Prior to that statement I had made absolutely ZERO statements about my ability to summarize the video. In other words, your overt racism is spewing through all the gaping canyons of your argument.
Had you instead asked:
"Is the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarize it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence?"
There would be nothing to see. But alas, you instead decided to go the ugly racist route.
@earl-of-trumps saidSaid the vengeful ghost of McCarthyism, have you pumped them reds out from under yer bed yet trump boy.
^^You wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit you in the arse
@joe-shmo said“You inferred I could not summarize it because it was "rambling and incoherent speech". Prior to that statement I had made absolutely ZERO statements about my ability to summarize the video. In other words, your overt racism is spewing through all the gaping canyons of your argument. “
You keep failing to understand that the statement you keep alluding to is the pre-judgement itself, not the explanation for pre judgment!
kevcvs57 page 1
“ If the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarise it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence then it’s probably not worth watching.”
You inferred I [b]could ...[text shortened]... ence?"
There would be nothing to see. But alas, you instead decided to go the ugly racist route.
If you cannot find any salient points for discussion then you shouldn’t bother to post it.
You shouldn’t ask people to give up 50 minutes of their time on three numbskulll nobody’s rambling on about all the stuff they don’t like. They zero intellectual or experience based authority, the two white guys could’ve been you and earl given the nonsensical crap they were offering up.
In future if you cannot find one single talking point in a link that your posting, probably don’t post it, and certainly don’t expect me or anyone else who disagrees with you to sit through one of your right wing propaganda diatribes.
@joe-shmo said“ But alas, you instead decided to go the ugly racist route“
You keep failing to understand that the statement you keep alluding to is the pre-judgement itself, not the explanation for pre judgment!
kevcvs57 page 1
“ If the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarise it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence then it’s probably not worth watching.”
You inferred I [b]could ...[text shortened]... ence?"
There would be nothing to see. But alas, you instead decided to go the ugly racist route.
Liar