21 Nov 15
Originally posted by SeitseFair enough, didn't realise we were discussing you.
Ok, sheeple, let's go back to the thread.
Topic is: [b]Is this thread an example of a mentally stable person?
Let's go through the clinical frame we've all been observing.
* passive aggressiveness
* obsessive compulsive behavior
* singleminded and narrow view of the world
* untrustworthiness in human relations, and
* pathological inability to assume responsibility for his words and actions
Debate![/b]
(And by calling people 'numbnuts' you are in actuality quoting Hinds).
Originally posted by SeitseOriginally posted by Grampy Bobby (OP, Page 1)
Ok, sheeple, let's go back to the thread.
Topic is: Is this thread an example of a mentally stable person?
Let's go through the clinical frame we've all been observing.
* passive aggressiveness
* obsessive compulsive behavior
* singleminded and narrow view of the world
* untrustworthiness in human relations, and
* pathological inability to assume responsibility for his words and actions
Debate!
101 Ways to Kill an Internet Forum Thread
1. Ignore its topic
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyCan you give us a link to a RHP thread that was trundling along ~ alive ~ at some point in the past which was then suddenly terminated ~ killed ~ by someone doing your No.29 above?
"101 Ways to Kill an Internet Forum Thread"
29. By thinking only about yourself and in the process allowing your untethered emotions to dominate your capacity for rational thought.
The post that was quoted here has been removedWhy don't you just debate him or argue with him instead of flinging abuse at him? Grampy Bobby is as much a contributor to the life of this forum as any of the other regular posters. He has as much right to hold his opinions and post about them as anyone else, including you, but you are just being abusive and adding no value whatsoever.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhat utter nonsense, Grampy Bobby. Subjectivity ~ along with diversity, honesty and sincerity ~ are the absolute life blood of an online community. Posting subjectively "kills" threads? What nonsense! 😀
30. By reacting [subjectively] rather than responding [objectively] to previous posts.
22 Nov 15
Originally posted by divegeesterExcellent post.
Why don't you just debate him or argue with him instead of flinging abuse at him? Grampy Bobby is as much a contributor to the life of this forum as any of the other regular posters. He has as much right to hold his opinions and post about them as anyone else, including you, but you are just being abusive and adding no value whatsoever.
It is part of forum life to challenge people, but personal abuse is just weak.
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukedivegeester indeed hit the nail on the head. Seitse's puerile and often nasty 'sense of humour' is well known, but Grampy Bobby very recently declined to condemn any of his posts, or to say which ones ought to be deleted by moderators, or nominate him for any sanctions.
Excellent post.
It is part of forum life to challenge people, but personal abuse is just weak.
Meanwhile, some of the nastiest invective seen on this forum in recent weeks ~ a rant about the stench of psychopaths' vomit or something along those lines (his first post on page 4) ~ was written by Grampy Bobby himself on this thread.
If his beef is with Seitse's dreary toxicity, then he should present his objections to the moderators rather than splatter his own raw humorless invective ~ always seemingly aimed at unnamed persons ~ across the forum. 🙂