5,000 days

@very-rusty said
You are just making an assumption.

An example of an assumption I made [a few weeks ago] was that you came to the aid of racist, Islamophobic Executioner Brand, at first anyway, because you stand for absolutely nothing, nothing you say matters, and you were just attention-seeking. That was me making an assumption.

@fmf said
I didn't say I "know", you silly billy. It is my firm belief.

All your doing is making an assumption, your strong belief means nothing.

I have been accused of alerting 5 and 6 posts when the rules were changed and one was only allowed 3 per day. I like to call it the gooster rule. People making assumptions about things do not make them correct.

-VR

@fmf said
An example of an assumption I made [a few weeks ago] was that you came to the aid of racist, Islamophobic Executioner Brand, at first anyway, because you stand for absolutely nothing, nothing you say matters, and you were just attention-seeking. That was me making an assumption.

There are two people here who attention seek. You would be one of them and your buddy gooster would be the other.

-VR

@very-rusty said
All your doing is making an assumption, your strong belief means nothing.

You could say the same thing about anyone's beliefs, at any time, on any thread, on any forum. So, bravo.

@very-rusty said
There are two people here who attention seek. You would be one of them and your buddy gooster would be the other.

Thank you for the observation. It was me, in part, anyway, who chased Executioner Brand off the site. You spent several weeks fighting his corner. Your attention-seeking is of a distinctly grotty kind.

@fmf said
You could say the same thing about anyone's beliefs, at any time, on any thread, on any forum. So, bravo.

Not if they have the facts to back up what they are saying. Other than that yes it would be an assumption and mine of you and your bud are spot on I am assuming of course. 🙂 😛 I assume most things said about you are pretty accurate! 🙂

-VR

@very-rusty said
I have been accused of alerting 5 and 6 posts when the rules were changed and one was only allowed 3 per day.

Gosh. Astaganaga! as they say here where I live.

@fmf said
Gosh. Astaganaga! as they say here where I live.

You know you can only get the last word in if I allow you to. 🙂 😛

I will defend pretty much anyone being ganged up be they right or wrong. I never did like a bunch on one.

You didn't chase EB off the site, he did that to himself. I told him to stay within the TOS Guidelines and didn't listen to me.

-VR

@fmf said
Today, it is exactly 5,000 days since I got my first anonymous thumb down for a General Forum post. I firmly believe, even to this day, that it was Suzianne.

5,000 days later, there is absolutely no way to know for sure, nor the reason.

Because someone was successful in lobbying for thumbs to be removed once the thread is closed.

So for sufficiently old threads, all record of the appropriateness of posts in said thread is concealed. Even removal of posts means nothing, because most posts that are removed are either removed by the poster, or are only removed once someone objects. And, of course, removal means a loss of evidence.

@fmf said
An example of an assumption I made [a few weeks ago] was that you came to the aid of racist, Islamophobic Executioner Brand, at first anyway, because you stand for absolutely nothing, nothing you say matters, and you were just attention-seeking. That was me making an assumption.

And, of course, this thread has nothing to do with attention-seeking.

@fmf said
Today, it is exactly 5,000 days since my first General Forum post. I am happy to say that I have never felt more at home here than I do today. Thank you everybody.

How many leap days does this include?

@suzianne said
And, of course, this thread has nothing to do with attention-seeking.

Of course! It's just a light-hearted thread on the General Forum, Suzianne.

@suzianne said
How many leap days does this include?

Four

@suzianne said
So for sufficiently old threads, all record of the appropriateness of posts in said thread is concealed. Even removal of posts means nothing, because most posts that are removed are either removed by the poster, or are only removed once someone objects. And, of course, removal means a loss of evidence.

It will forever be a mystery and my firm belief will never be corroborated.

@suzianne said
Because someone was successful in lobbying for thumbs to be removed once the thread is closed.

That "someone" was perhaps Grampy Bobby.