Go back
A.N.U.S.

A.N.U.S.

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
This is one of the biggest problems I have with Tarantino films. Most of them are good, some of them are excellent, but in almost every film he has to have a close up of the lead actress' feet because he has a foot fetish.
Maybe Scarlett Johansson's feet...nobody else's.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ice Cold
Meat cutter is the job description, Journeyman Butcher is the title.
Or more well known as Bill Cutting,

Vote Up
Vote Down

What a wonderful thread!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
This is one of the biggest problems I have with Tarantino films. Most of them are good, some of them are excellent, but in almost every film he has to have a close up of the lead actress' feet because he has a foot fetish.
it could have been worse. he could have had a nostril fetish.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blackamp
it could have been worse. he could have had a nostril fetish.
What about a liver fetish?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
What about a liver fetish?
inner beauty rules.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
inner beauty rules.
Particularly if confirmed through a colonoscopy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Bump for the anus!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
So I come up with this Association of National Users of Sedatives, and
tell the guy who was handing me the pamphlet with their rants about
government attempts to control their pills even tighter...

- Yo, snowflake, you guys don't come up with the acronym of the
association because you're evil or plain innocent, which one is it?


- Wut?
...[text shortened]... camera stuff or people
don't check anymore the acronyms of their associations
and clubs?
Seitse, please teach an aging and harmless dinosaur the ropes. How does the fair and equitable, non-disparate

and non-double standard, impartial and legally defensible General Forum volunteer moderator administration

of RHP TOS allow some members to get away with casual 'obfuscated profanity' and not others? Just wondering.



___________________________________________

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Seitse, please teach an aging and harmless dinosaur the ropes. How does the fair and equitable, non-disparate

and non-double standard, impartial and legally defensible General Forum volunteer moderator administration

of RHP TOS allow some members to get away with casual 'obfuscated profanity' and not others? Just wondering.



___________________________________________
Clicking the alert button and, if it doesn't work, using the feedback.

It is also useful to send a letter to the authorities in order to include
parts of the body as 'profanity' in their censorship list.

Once one is occupied in such endeavors, though, I'd recommend to
make the ride worth by also requiring the following words in the
aforementioned list:

- Eyes
- Intestines
- Hands
- Feet
- Colon
- Femur
- Knee
- Belly button
- Hair

Good luck, dear Bob.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
My mistake, then. I apologize for being defensive.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
My mistake, then. I apologize for being defensive.
Please answer my simple question.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
so you can get pretty cheap cuts of good meat for yourself?
Ask your mom, she knows all about my meat. 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ice Cold
Ask your mom, she knows all about my meat. 😛
she's into vienna suasage?😕

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.