Originally posted by divegeester@divegeester: "The profile that was written here has been removed."
Why have you quoted my profile?
Why not?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhatever you say, dude, you are the "unafraid" and "pioneering" troll.
Now you've lapsed back into projecting your own behaviours on to others with whom you have unresolved personal issues. Sad...
Anyway, I am not the one obsessed about the "well being of 13 year olds"
and the alert button.
In some countries people with that obsession are banned from
approaching kindergartens, you know 😉
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyA weak come back, even by your diluted standards.
@divegeester: "The profile that was written here has been removed."
Why not?
Originally posted by SeitseI am sorry for your legal troubles.
Whatever you say, dude, you are the "unafraid" and "pioneering" troll.
Anyway, I am not the one obsessed about the "well being of 13 year olds"
and the alert button.
In some countries people with that obsession are banned from
approaching kindergartens, you know 😉
Why do you want to go back to Kindergarten again anyway?
I know the third grade is difficult for you, but I am almost certain you will pass this year and for sure next year.
Originally posted by divegeesterOriginally posted by Grampy Bobby
]A weak come back, even by your diluted standards.
"Red, my view is that this second public forum post legitimately focuses on lowered standards of civility in this site's spirituality forum
Originally posted by divegeester
"Of course, what you are actually referring to is people simply disagreeing with you and not soaking up every piece of mumbo-jumbo you pass off as a scriptural exegesis."
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
@divegeester: "The profile that was written here has been removed."
__________________
Q. Did Russ recently promote you to an unannounced position as judge and jury of his online general forum? If so, what guidelines did he provide?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyDG is normally quite tedious, but in this case you have to admit he has a point.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"Red, my view is that this second public forum post legitimately focuses on lowered standards of civility in this site's spirituality forum
Originally posted by divegeester
[b]"Of course, what you are actually referring to is people simply disagreeing with you and not soaking up every piece of mu ...[text shortened]... d position as judge and jury of his online general forum? If so, what guidelines did he provide?[/b]