@divegeester saidNaturally, this doesn't show how you later embellished that exact story.
No it isn’t. You’re a blatant liar.
Proof.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/196842019@N08/52447226716/in/photostream/lightbox/
How sad that you enshrine my posts in this fashion.
@suzianne saidThere is one of yours in the archive that Ghost of a Duke, and divegeester, and I kept back in the day, where, after the three of us had been trolled incessantly for months by Romans1009 ~ to the point that Ghost of a Duke, and divegeester and I stopped replying to his posts for several months in 2018 ~ and then Romans1009 got banned from the site, you immediately blamed divegeester and me - although not Ghost of a Duke - of "driving Romans1009 from the website".
How sad that you enshrine my posts in this fashion.
@fmf saidFive years ago?
There is one of yours in the archive that Ghost of a Duke, and divegeester, and I kept back in the day, where, after the three of us had been trolled incessantly for months by Romans1009 ~ to the point that Ghost of a Duke, and divegeester and I stopped replying to his posts for several months in 2018 ~ and then Romans1009 got banned from the site, you immediately blamed divegeester and me - although not Ghost of a Duke - of "driving Romans1009 from the website".
The very fact that you said "in the archive" should concern every user on this site, unless this is more "when I was in the Yakusa" nonsense.
@divegeester saidExcept the differences in "versions" isn't me getting it wrong because I forgot what I said, you might have a case if that were the case, but it's not, it's your embellishments.
I have to keep records of certain pieces of BS you post because you’re a pathological liar.
21 Nov 23
@fmf saidBut mainly @divegeester. Too bad he never included his embellishments.
Yes, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, Ghost of a Duke, divegeester, and I had a kind of archive of interesting posts.
21 Nov 23
@suzianne saidNope. All three of us.
But mainly @divegeester. Too bad he never included his embellishments.