334d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou edited out the bit where I said it's OK by me. So, the violin riff doesn't work.
Hang on, that violin is definitely around here somewhere.
334d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt was just a typo.
"I don't that's true" isn't a coherent sentence.
Would you classify those six posts in reply to what she said abour my posting on the Debates Forum as "hate posts"?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou appear to be completely misjudging what is going on.
OK, cello it is then.
334d
@fmf said@suzianne said
You appear to be completely misjudging what is going on.
Your agenda is to reduce public credibility of people who disagree with you, in order to limit the damage to your own credibility, which seems such a tiny pathetic animal at times.
'Tiny pathetic animal' was directly related to your credibility? Can you not follow a simple sentence?
334d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI said she seemed to be calling me "a tiny pathetic animal".
@suzianne said
Your agenda is to reduce public credibility of people who disagree with you, in order to limit the damage to your own credibility, which seems such a tiny pathetic animal at times.
'Tiny pathetic animal' was directly related to your credibility? Can you not follow a simple sentence?
Is it a "hate post" if she says something like this?
@fmf saidAnyone can see that your name is all over the forums. If not creating, you are commenting on anything you don't create. In sum that's all on the forums. I don't see how anyone can avoid posting where you are not, or have been. It would appear that everyone here is following you 24 hrs a day, and 365 days of the year, all the years you have been here, I assume. Which means we need to add 1 day to the 365, every leap year.
Yeah right. And yet you follow me around, from thread to thread, and from forum to forum, week in week out, year after year, trying to post something tetchy in reply to as many of my posts as you possibly can.
And sir, by golly, you seem to leap better than a frog, going from thread to thread. Mr. Clemens could have used you, in his story. How and where, I'll leave it up to your skill. But I'm nearly certain that you will create a thread, as an excuse to address frog-leaping contests.
Your twin seems to jump with you.....Craniopagus parasiticus?
It's only a virtual observation of conjoined mental twins, and not an official, physical, medical assessment.
334d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIf I said something like this to her, would it be a "hate post" - to her way of thinking - do you reckon?
@suzianne said
Your agenda is to reduce public credibility of people who disagree with you, in order to limit the damage to your own credibility, which seems such a tiny pathetic animal at times.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWe can always mandate it, like any other penalty.
@FMF
@suzianne said
Your agenda is to reduce public credibility of people who disagree with you, in order to limit the damage to your own credibility, which seems such a tiny pathetic animal at times.
'Tiny pathetic animal' was directly related to your credibility? Can you not follow a simple sentence?
@pettytalk saidIf you were Suzianne you’d call me far worse than that and you’d be twice as smart as you think you are now.
If I were her, I would just call you an idiot.
Here’s a few insights for you to ponder over:
- I have a lot more respect for Suzianne than I do for you.
- If you were attacking Suzianne, I’d step in to back her up.
- If she was attacking you, I’d step in to take a piss on your slashed and bloodied weedy body.
I trust my forthrightness regarding our ongoing posting relationship is taking shape 🙂
334d
@divegeester saidThat's a pretty disturbed thing to post.
- If she was attacking you, I’d step in to take a piss on your slashed and bloodied weedy body.
You should apologise.