- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
@divegeester saidDivestalker trolls posters' personal information after gleaning it from posts both recent and past.
Why is it “sufficient” that “others” know this?
Why won’t you say which website it is?
Why remain a mod at a site you are no longer active at?
Lacking a natural sense of empowerment, he uses twisted sleuthing as suitable substitute.
There's a word for habitual behaviors like his:
Disturbed.
03 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI don't.
My activity on that site is low, but I remain a mod.
I have no interest in directing you. Others know who I am there. That's sufficient.
@very-rusty saidThere are similarities (psychological) and they have like minded goals and methods, but I don't believe they are the same person.
It is just that you are so much alike you seem like the same person is all. Reason, why I have nick named you the TWINS!!!! 🙂
-VR
Dive is aggressive and FMF is passive aggressive, and the way they work together is highly suggestive of an ersatz marriage of the minds honed by years of practice.
I'm not a psychologist, but it doesn't take much analysis to see what's up with these two. BTW, I just recently became aware of how vulnerable and fragile their Ego's are. FMF nearly had a melt down over the word "bubble head", so I'll avoid using that particular descriptive in our next dance session.
04 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidFMF is passive-aggressive
There are similarities (psychological) and they have like minded goals and methods, but I don't believe they are the same person.
Dive is aggressive and FMF is passive aggressive, and the way they work together is highly suggestive of an ersatz marriage of the minds honed by years of practice.
I'm not a psychologist, but it doesn't take much analysis to see what's up ...[text shortened]... r the word "bubble head", so I'll avoid using that particular descriptive in our next dance session.
I'd say I am unflustered. You have the meaning of "passive-aggressive" wrong.
04 Feb 23
@fmf saidYes. On page 33 of this thread.
A "melt down"?
"...you have referred to me and divegeester ~ and nobody else ~ as "bubbleheads" countless times."
To which I responded:
"No I haven't.
(countless times?)"
And you answered:
"Yes."
You were obviously triggered by my saying "bubble head". It was a relatively innocuous insult and said only once, not countless times.
If you can show me any other place I've said this then I will conceded I've said it more than once. But I'm curious as to your reaction to "bubble head". It can't be insignificant if you are claiming I've said it to you and Dive "countless times".
I'm just wondering what set you off, because there's quite a bit of difference between once and countless times.
04 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidYou were obviously triggered by my saying "bubble head".
Yes. On page 33 of this thread.
"...you have referred to me and divegeester ~ and nobody else ~ as "bubbleheads" countless times."
To which I responded:
"No I haven't.
(countless times?)"
And you answered:
"Yes."
You were obviously triggered by my saying "bubble head". It was a relatively innocuous insult and said only once, not countless ...[text shortened]... dering what set you off, because there's quite a bit of difference between once and countless times.
Nope, not "triggered". No "melt down" either. You've used the term "bubble head" countless times. It's not banter that I am phased by.
04 Feb 23
@fmf saidYou've used the term "bubble head" countless times."
You were obviously triggered by my saying "bubble head".
Nope, not "triggered". No "melt down" either. You've used the term "bubble head" countless times. It's not banter that I am phased by.
So that's your story and you're sticking to it, eh?
I won't ask you to prove it because I know you can't, and I suppose you could claim it happened too long ago for you to dig up an example.
04 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidActually, I am simply not going to spend any of my time looking for examples. If there are people here who think I am lying about you, then I'm fine with that.
So that's your story and you're sticking to it, eh?
I won't ask you to prove it because I know you can't, and I suppose you could claim it happened too long ago for you to dig up an example.
@fmf saidI don't think you're lying, not intentionally.
Actually, I am simply not going to spend any of my time looking for examples. If there are people here who think I am lying about you, then I'm fine with that.
I think you were reacting (and still are) to an emotional memory of some past encounter between you and another poster, who may or may not still be here.
And I just happened to say something that triggered that memory. Why else would you claim I've said something "countless" times without any way to prove it?
Or perhaps this is a sly way for you to suggest I'm a former member who came back as someone else. I think you and Dive are capable of just about anything when it comes to malevolent word play.