Adieu

@fmf said
I think lying about PMs puts a poster at risk of being seen as a scumbag.

But not pranking about a death during a pandemic? Is that seriously your position?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Where did I mention any other scumbags?

Again, you introduced the word.

In his defense he may have been looking in a mirror at the time the word was mentioned.

-VR

@ghost-of-a-duke said
But not pranking about a death during a pandemic? Is that seriously your position?

The prank 2.5 years ago had no victims. Lying about PMs could conceivably be a case of victimizing someone.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Where did I mention any other scumbags?

If you don't think there are any, apart from me, just feel free to say so.

@fmf said
The prank 2.5 years ago had no victims. Lying about PMs could conceivably be a case of victimizing someone.

That was no prank that was an out right lie, and you went with it. What does that make you. No VICTIMS???? People were dying around the world!

-VR

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Again, you introduced the word.

Again, I think lying about PMs could put a poster at risk of being seen as a scumbag.

@fmf said
Again, I think lying about PMs could put a poster at risk of being seen as a scumbag.

Oh well, deal with it.

@fmf said
The prank 2.5 years ago had no victims. Lying about PMs could conceivably be a case of victimizing someone.

Again, an (obvious) joke about receiving PMs sees a chap labelled as a scumbag, but pranking about a death during a pandemic (when people are experiencing real life deaths) is all fine and dandy? Good timing in fact?

You've built your hut sir on unstable ground.


Edit: This is a doubling down disaster for FMF, the likes of which has never been seen before on RHP. It defies all known logic.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Again, an (obvious) joke about receiving PMs sees a chap labelled as a scumbag, but pranking about a death during a pandemic (when people are experiencing real life deaths) is all fine and dandy? Good timing in fact?

If he lied about receiving PMs and wanted people to believe it then that could put him at risk of being seen as a scumbag. If it was a joke, then ok it was a joke. And yes, the prank 2.5 years ago was fine.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
You've built your hut sir on unstable ground.

I disagree.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
This is a doubling down disaster for FMF, the likes of which has never been seen before on RHP. It defies all known logic.

How am I "doubling down"?. I think the prank was fine. I still do.

@fmf said
If he lied about receiving PMs and wanted people to believe it then that could put him at risk of being seen as a scumbag. If it was a joke, then ok it was a joke. And yes, the prank 2.5 years ago was fine.

To clarify, is the scum bag nature of an action negated by a passing of 2.5 years?

@fmf said
If he lied about receiving PMs and wanted people to believe it then that could put him at risk of being seen as a scumbag. If it was a joke, then ok it was a joke. And yes, the prank 2.5 years ago was fine.

Your so called Prank which was a lie, puts you in scumbag territory for sure! Funny, everyone knew I was joking but YOU..>..Don't you find that strange? Everyone wrong and you correct?

-VR

@fmf said
How am I "doubling down"?. I think the prank was fine. I still do.

You just answered your own question Sherlock.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
To clarify, is the scum bag nature of an action negated by a passing of 2.5 years?

The prank didn't have any "scumbag nature" because it was victimless, but it's interesting that you are still droning on about it two and a half years later.