Go back
Another case of discrimination at RHP

Another case of discrimination at RHP

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
2, I says 2 Non Sub Recs! Hold the Mayo that is!

P-
Idle thought for the day: should we distinguish between non-sub recs and lapsed-sub recs?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orfeo
Idle thought for the day: should we distinguish between non-sub recs and lapsed-sub recs?
I think we should have a tea party for non-subscribers; they can serve us tea and cookies and we can enjoy some civilized conversation and bask in our illustriousness whilst shushing their idle chatter.
Ah, the good old days, I do hope Queen Victoria returns soon.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
I think we should have a tea party for non-subscribers; they can serve us tea and cookies and we can enjoy some civilized conversation and bask in our illustriousness whilst shushing their idle chatter.
Ah, the good old days, I do hope Queen Victoria returns soon.
I think you stink!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Azeri guy
I think you stink!
excellent name calling.... kneverknight you stink... do we get to play musical chairs only for subscribers though....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by fiesta
excellent name calling.... kneverknight you stink... do we get to play musical chairs only for subscribers though....
Excellent suggestion!
Musical chairs is only for the cultured folk; the others can play "find the shoe" or whatever it is that they do.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
I think we should have a tea party for non-subscribers; they can serve us tea and cookies and we can enjoy some civilized conversation and bask in our illustriousness whilst shushing their idle chatter.
Ah, the good old days, I do hope Queen Victoria returns soon.
It's a scientific fact that subscribers are definitely sub-human sour-faced simpletons, who can't see past their computer monitor and their poor chess skills. There i said it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
It's a scientific fact that subscribers are definitely sub-human sour-faced simpletons, who can't see past their computer monitor and their poor chess skills. There i said it.
not as sour face as non-subs if they are all like you. you said scientific fact so please prove it. Once a non-sub always a non-sub so there is nothing much to comment about.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ericwong
Once a non-sub always a non-sub...
That doesn't make sense, RiceGown.


Filthy subscriber. There, I said it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
It's a scientific fact that subscribers are definitely sub-human sour-faced simpletons, who can't see past their computer monitor and their poor chess skills. There i said it.
What you say may or may not be true but it is irrelevant; good breeding will always win out over the crass lower-class antics you lot put out.

Long live RHP, the chess site the Sun never sets on! Three cheers and a Tiger for her loyal Stars!

Oh alright, some sticks and empty tin cans for the noners to make some senseless noise with, but I warn you; creeping democracy will be the end of Life as We know it!




1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
What you say may or may not be true but it is irrelevant...
No, but your statement is a shining example of an irrelevant remark steep in sheer stupidity. Only a monkey behind a keyboard...errrr... i mean a subscriber would make just a grand and outrageous pronouncement.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
No, but your statement is a shining example of an irrelevant remark steep in sheer stupidity. Only a monkey behind a keyboard...errrr... i mean a subscriber would make just a grand and outrageous pronouncement.
It pleases me that you consider my pronouncements grand, it shows that there is hope yet for the lower classes and that you are learning your place. Bully for you!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
It pleases me that you consider my pronouncements grand, it shows that there is hope yet for the lower classes and that you are learning your place. Bully for you!
It was a code word. i meant inept, but i didn't want to scare you away.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
It was a code word. i meant inept, but i didn't want to scare you away.
You really should capitalize "I", it shows a frightful lack of self-respect old chap, but I suppose you come by it honestly.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
You really should capitalize "I", it shows a frightful lack of self-respect old chap, but I suppose you come by it honestly.
What next you gonna' tell me how to tie my shoelaces? 🙄 Don't be a witless chump. 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
What next you gonna' tell me how to tie my shoelaces? 🙄 Don't be a witless chump. 😛
Shoe laces? I would have pegged you for the type to wear Velcro straps.

Huh, go figgure...

RTh

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.