General
05 Oct 03
06 Oct 03
1 edit
Originally posted by SirLoseALotPersonally I dont see the need for 'Lists' at all, but hey, each to their own 😛
Yup!Or whatever the time limit is.I'm not for timing out people,nor am I against it.Just wanted to make a counterpart for the other list.
Most people here don't even know when a game is lost,and I am one of them,so I play on to see ...[text shortened]... don't like that,you're welcome to resign.Really,I don't mind 😉
Re: lost games, we're talking lost as in lost - you know - when you've got only a king and the other player has queen and two rooks 😏
07 Oct 03
Originally posted by derek9037I'm against the list-thing too.That's why I made this one,to show how silly the other one is.Guess it doesn't make much sense,but neither do I 😉
Personally I dont see the need for 'Lists' at all, but hey, each to their own 😛
Re: lost games, we're talking lost as in lost - you know - when you've got only a king and the other player has queen and two rooks 😏
About the lost games.K vs K+R+Q sure is a lost game.But do you want me to count the number of games my oppo stalemated me being up that much material?Though that were OTB games.Here I would certainly resign.But I don't mind others playing on.There's also some gentlemanlike behaviour in allowing the checkmate.
07 Oct 03
1 edit
Originally posted by SirLoseALotYes it is nice to complete a good sequence with a mate 🙂
About the lost games.K vs K+R+Q sure is a lost game.But do you want me to count the number of games my oppo stalemated me being up that much material?Though that were OTB games.Here I would certainly resign.But I don't mind others pl ...[text shortened]... re's also some gentlemanlike behaviour in allowing the checkmate.
As for stalemates etc, haven't done it for a while, but only yesterday I lost to a back row mate 😀 despite being well ahead (RHP Live) and in a clan game I had to accept a draw after messing up a clear advantage in the pawn ending, so I take your point 😉