Originally posted by trev33Let's just call it semantics shall we?😏
if i was ordering a scotch and soda i would except the soda to come in a separate bottle unless i said a scotch WITH soda. when i order it it's a scotch AND soda but when i mixed them together it's a scotch WITH soda. ¿entienda?
Originally posted by trev33Why would I presume to know (or assume) that if Raven had HAVE said that she drinks milk and vodka or 100% juice and water that she did so either way. I only asked why (as I interpretted it) anyone would want to dilute the juice with water. She may have responded "because I'm on a very strict budget and want to stretch it out" or maybe a simple "because it's the way I like it".
lets not. if raven had of said milk and vodka, would you assume that she only drinks milk with vodka mixed in the same glass? of course not.
i'm right, you're wrong la lala lala la 😏
Originally posted by Great Big Steeswhat? she isn't diluting it.
Why would I presume to know (or assume) that if Raven had HAVE said that she drinks milk and vodka or 100% juice and water that she did so either way. I only asked why (as I interpretted it) anyone would want to dilute the juice with water. She may have responded "because I'm on a very strict budget and want to stretch it out" or maybe a simple "because it's the way I like it".
*must pay attention
Originally posted by PonderableI woonted to give those British Columbites a little jolt 😛
You Managed to start a thread with an appreciable number of posts (most unconnected to the title which is not surprising anybody)
You didn't succeed in explaining why you think your statement has any merit.