Originally posted by TurtlestackI was going to go see Eragon tomorrow, but maybe I'll see this one instead.
The movie is being compared to 'Blade Runner' only because of the dystopian future depicted in the film but other than that they are two very different works of art. 'Children of Men' I believe is better compared to the new Battlestar Galactica.
Originally posted by arrakisI heard Eragon was pretty weak but I have not seen it either. 'Children of Men' is quite unlike any film I've seen in a long time. I guess technicaly it is a sci-fi but the futuristic setting is only a way to comment on today's society in the same way the new 'Battlestar Galactica' does.
I was going to go see Eragon tomorrow, but maybe I'll see this one instead.
BTW: There is a MAJOR Pink Floyd reference near the halfway point of the film (grab your copy of 'Animals' and you'll see what I mean).
Originally posted by mokkoI agree absolutely 😕 However, why didn't we see any other obviously terminal cases of wanton debauchery?
And did you like his fatefull ending as well. Very fitting considering his philandering ways. 🙁
You know what I mean? 😛 Before he's finally getting all flaky and degenerate. Somebody else?
So that it doesn't seem like his just desserts are a one-of kind of plot device for the puritans in the audience????
Originally posted by widgetSome things are best left to the imagination. 😳
I agree absolutely 😕 However, why didn't we see any other obviously terminal cases of wanton debauchery?
You know what I mean? 😛 [b]Before he's finally getting all flaky and degenerate. Somebody else?
So that it doesn't seem like his just desserts are a one-of kind of plot device for the puritans in the audience????[/b]