12 Dec 20
4 edits
@rookie54 saidI am hoping there will be via my book after its published, meaning that my book will prompt such a peer review; An unorthodoxed strategy of mine as that isn't the usual way such a thing works in science or mathematics. But there are subtle reasons why I have chosen that strategy.
will there be peer review of yer research, theories, and conclusions?
I made sure I have some extremely good evidence, proof in fact, in the form of computer simulations explained in my book ready for any peer review and what that proves is that the pinnacle of tavology research, which is my correct solution to the German tank problem as opposed to the old flawed one, is the correct solution. And this is on top of the mathematical proof of that! The reason why I bothered with the simulation proof when I already had the maths proof is that I feared the maths proof alone in this case wouldn't be enough to persuade many statisticians that what they have long been always taught about that is wrong but those two proofs combined should absolutely guarantee my research results would get a generally very favorable approval from any peer review.