Go back
Forum Moderation

Forum Moderation

General

d

Joined
05 Jan 04
Moves
45179
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
"of course to you that means everything has to be at a 13 year old's level"
Oh boy. 😞

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
"of course to you that means everything has to be at a 13 year old's level"
That's a "personal attack"???🙄

Obviously you don't want to address the points raised.

D
Mr. Bombastic

Ogden, Ut

Joined
14 Jan 05
Moves
12253
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
That's a "personal attack"???🙄

Obviously you don't want to address the points raised.
Look up the definition of ad hominem. It clearly falls under that.

Also, questioning my motivations "you don't want to address the points raised" is another ad hominem.

Personally, I think your points are valid, but I'd rather not banter with you.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
Please, no1, this forum hardly fits that description.

What is it you say? You're being shrill and emotional, Mary?
Perhaps not, but that is the standard the three Mods here are espousing. That they aren't as diligent in enforcing that policy (well, not against everybody) as they profess shouldn't stop me from debating their professed position.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Apr 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
Look up the definition of ad hominem. It clearly falls under that.

Also, questioning my motivations "you don't want to address the points raised" is another ad hominem.

Personally, I think your points are valid, but I'd rather not banter with you.
Then don't.

BTW, that's not an "ad hominem"; it's a characterization of his position, not of HIM.

kirksey957
Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
Nope, I'm talking about your last post to me. if you weren't trying to be difficult, you wouldn't have conveniently forgotten that pornography was (and still is) being mentioned in this thread.

You're welcome.
Yes, and who threw it in to the mix?

D
Mr. Bombastic

Ogden, Ut

Joined
14 Jan 05
Moves
12253
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
Yes, and who threw it in to the mix?
I couldn't care less.

D
Mr. Bombastic

Ogden, Ut

Joined
14 Jan 05
Moves
12253
Clock
29 Apr 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Then don't.

BTW, that's not an "ad hominem"; it's a characterization of his position, not of HIM.
Wikipedia says:

"An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the man", "argument against the man) consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim."

You made an attack on his (or my) belief.

It is hard not to respond to you when you are so absolutley wrong.

kirksey957
Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
I couldn't care less.
Take your toys and go home. Be gone.

D
Mr. Bombastic

Ogden, Ut

Joined
14 Jan 05
Moves
12253
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
Take your toys and go home. Be gone.
I didn't even talk to you or mention you, but you still felt the need to defend yourself and be difficult.

You aren't important enough for me to talk about, I don't know why you thought you were.

huckleberryhound
Devout Agnostic.

DZ-015

Joined
12 Oct 05
Moves
42584
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
Take your toys and go home. Be gone.
Seems like that's your only response to the majority that disagree with you 😛

kirksey957
Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
I didn't even talk to you or mention you, but you still felt the need to defend yourself and be difficult.

You aren't important enough for me to talk about, I don't know why you thought you were.
Because forum moderators tell me so.

D
Mr. Bombastic

Ogden, Ut

Joined
14 Jan 05
Moves
12253
Clock
29 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
Because forum moderators tell me so.
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have been so mean. I just made a comment and you assumed that it was about you, but it wasn't. You are very important, don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Apr 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
Wikipedia says:

"An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the man", "argument against the man) consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing e n his (or my) belief.

It is hard not to respond to you when you are so absolutley wrong.
Jesus H Christmas.

"than by addressing the substance of the argument"

I was addressing the substance of his argument which is that all posts on this site have to be acceptable to a 13 year old mentality. This is a curious position on a site which states in its TOS that you should be over 18 to use the site.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.