04 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat do you make of Grampy Bobby's suggestion that the OP is "offensive"?
A confession at last!
Divesgeester a deadly accurate portrayal by GB - hypersensitive to his own sensibilities and insensitive toward the sensibilities of other people! WOW!
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by divegeester"Forum Guidelines: •Discussions in forums can often get heated, but while you may take issue with another poster's viewpoint, you must not resort to personal attacks or abuse. Do not post offensive or inflammatory remarks that stray beyond the bounds of reasoned debate. Calling another poster an "idiot" will leave a post subject to immediate removal." Help : forumguide
Perhaps I am, who knows...and so what about it?
You and Grampy Bobby are pompous, arrogant, abusive blowhards, but nobody seems to care much.
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThis copy paste clearly isn't something you apply to your self-professed supporters.
"Forum Guidelines: •Discussions in forums can often get heated, but while you may take issue with another poster's viewpoint, you must not resort to personal attacks or abuse. Do not post offensive or inflammatory remarks that stray beyond the bounds of reasoned debate. Calling another poster an "idiot" will leave a post subject to immediate removal." Help : forumguide
Are you not willing to discuss your contention that the OP is "offensive"?
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMF@Crowley
This copy paste clearly isn't something you apply to your self-professed supporters.
Are you not willing to discuss your contention that the OP is "offensive"?
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI don't think so no. I think you might be conflating opinions with sensibilities. Grampy Bobby has only brought "sensibilities" up because he disapproves of and disagrees with divegeester's opinions and he would never brandish his 'sensibilities analysis' against anyone he approved of, even if they were boorish and facile.
Why don't you just tell me? surely it will only take a post?
divesgeesters own sensibilities are more important than the sensibilities of other people because. . . . . .
Originally posted by FMFNo i dint think I am, 'conflating opinions with sensibilities'. Divesgeester when asked, 'why he was hypersensitive to his own sensibilities and insensitive to the sensibilities of others', did not deny the charge. This leaves the discerning reader with the question why his sensibilities should be considered as paramount. Is he a megalomaniac? a sociopath? surely there must be some reason?
I don't think so no. I think you might be conflating opinions with sensibilities. Grampy Bobby has only brought "sensibilities" up because he disapproves of and disagrees with divegeester's opinions and he would never brandish his 'sensibilities analysis' against anyone he approved of, even if they were boorish and facile.
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIs who a megalomaniac or a sociopath? divegeester? No. Why? Do you think he is?
No i dint think I am, 'conflating opinions with sensibilities'. Divesgeester when asked, 'why he was hypersensitive to his own sensibilities and insensitive to the sensibilities of others', did not deny the charge. This leaves the discerning reader with the question why his sensibilities should be considered as paramount. Is he a megalomaniac? a sociopath? surely there must be some reason?
04 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think the only thing underpinning your thinking and posting here is that you're trying to be funny and scornful at the same time, and the subject matter does not matter one whit.
I am only surmising. It could be something as benign as a lack of modesty or lack of empathy towards others. Personally I think its a spiritual problem.