General
21 Apr 22
21 Apr 22
@vivify saidI think this is a misleading statement. Sure, 'many' people might think that, but the overwhelming majority do not.
It seems many people in Britain were upset with the idea that the Royal bloodline may have a nonwhite person.
In a population of 67 million it could just as easily be stated that 'many' people believe the Earth is flat or that Elvis runs a chip shop in Harrogate.
@mchill saidBecause their wealth is… “their wealth”, it doesn’t belong to the state.
I've always thought very highly of the Brit's, but their royal family (and royal families everywhere) can best be described as "decaying gentry" Other than occasional military service, these people rarely do anything useful. Why doesn't the British government simply disband this group, use their wealth for the good of the all the British subjects, let them go and support themselves?
@mchill saidThe solution to your “unhappiness” (sic) is not to “disband” the entire institution which is worth billions (edit; I made that up, it its a lot) in UK income, it is to evolve the Monarchy.
If the Brit's are happy with that arrangement, that's fine with me, but it seems these people should be doing something more than going on vacations, presiding over charity events, giving out awards, and getting their photos taken. Maybe they are the British version of the Kardashians.
@vivify saidThere are many people in the world who were born rich. Their parents might have worked hard to obtain a wealth but their children might never learn how to manage money and make money work. You may be right in saying that the royal families have much money undeservedly, but I wouldn't say that they are not needed.
At the very least, it wouldn't go to people whose only qualification was being born to the right family.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWell... they're liars, and I'm not sure about the rest of this forum.
In a population of 67 million it could just as easily be stated that 'many' people believe the Earth is flat or that Elvis runs a chip shop in Harrogate.
21 Apr 22
@torunn saidRather them than nouveaux riches like the Trumps, the Kennedy's, or the Bushes.
There are many people in the world who were born rich. Their parents might have worked hard to obtain a wealth but their children might never learn how to manage money and make money work. You may be right in saying that the royal families have much money undeservedly, but I wouldn't say that they are not needed.
22 Apr 22
@shallow-blue saidWell, there is a chip shop owner in Harrogate that has an uncanny resemblance to Elvis.
Well... they're liars, and I'm not sure about the rest of this forum.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDid he know Kirsty?
Well, there is a chip shop owner in Harrogate that has an uncanny resemblance to Elvis.
24 Apr 22
@ghost-of-a-duke saidExcept they themselves have stated racism is what specifically drove them from the Royal Family.
I think this is a misleading statement. Sure, 'many' people might think that, but the overwhelming majority do not.
In a population of 67 million it could just as easily be stated that 'many' people believe the Earth is flat or that Elvis runs a chip shop in Harrogate.
@divegeester saidYes, the Royal Family are glorified Kardashians.
Part of the attraction of a “Royal Family” is that they are actually a family.