07 Jun 08
Originally posted by Grampy BobbySchakuhr, thought you might take a moment to reply.
Looked at a few of your current games. Impression is that your play is characterized by innovative patience and intervals of seemingly
passive moves. When the positional tension becomes favorable... you appear to morph into the nimble aggressor and, without the least
hesitation, to bring the 'game on' pressure to bear. Dimensions of the entire gender spectrum are present in your games. Am I wrong?
07 Jun 08
Originally posted by Grampy Bobbywhat are your qualifications? Old age doesn't count.
Looked at a few of your current games. Impression is that your play is characterized by innovative patience and intervals of seemingly
passive moves. When the positional tension becomes favorable... you appear to morph into the nimble aggressor and, without the least
hesitation, to bring the 'game on' pressure to bear. Dimensions of the entire gender spectrum are present in your games. Am I wrong?
07 Jun 08
Originally posted by schakuhr'Gender style of play' (apparent in informal correspondence chess games) seems to be the subjective topic of your thread. Struck me
what are your qualifications? Old age doesn't count.
as an interesting topic which, to my knowledge, has seldom if ever been raised before. Felt free to participate in the converstion, as
an amateur pundit, and found your play reflects both gender styles. That's all. For you, as sponsor of the thread, to now publically ask
for "qualifications" and to mention "old age" comes as a surprise... sort of an evasive red herring gambit displacing the conversation.
