@ghost-of-a-duke saidDo you think Duchess64 should return to the Debates Forum?
You have not equipped yourself well in this forum. Why not just return to the SF?
@great-big-stees saidSome of us get attention, some of us get sex đ
How many folks here, in this thread...no wait, all the threads no matter the forum, are just here seeking attention? đ¤
For longer than 3 mins too đŽ
@drewnogal saidDoesn’t there have to be attention to get sex?đ¤
Some of us get attention, some of us get sex đ
05 Jul 21
The post that was quoted here has been removeddrewnogal is not "gullible". And saying her post "had little meaningful content" is just you being evasive. I am baffled by the intensity of the animosity you feel for drewnogal and how it seems to taint everything you say to and about her.
05 Jul 21
@drewnogal saidThat was entirely FMF's fault.
Wrong end of the stick here I’m afraid. My reference to this thread not being funny was the way the locker room talk between Duchess64 and yourself derailed this thread into the descent of a personal character assassination of FMF.
I saw the comments earlier talking about "no sense of humor". Give me a break.
The thread started with humor and FMF just HAD to derail it into what you unsurprisingly call "personal character assassination". He caused this. It did not start that way. It was HIS intent to make it so. What he is doing to the General Forum happened before. To the Spirituality Forum. And is still happening. He and his erstwhile friend have locked that forum down to such a degree that only his sycophants can post there without experiencing Spanish-Inquisition-style interrogation. And mark my words: he and his friend want to bring that "freedom" and "clarity" to the General Forum.
They are not Messiahs. They are Destroyers. But apparently, no one will see this until it is too late to stop it. The Spirituality Forum is a wasteland. Everyone here knows it. But no one wants to admit that what is going on in the General Forum, because of them, is the same thing that happened to the SF. Same architects, same result.
Call me Cassandra.
05 Jul 21
@great-big-stees saidYes but don’t assume you’ll get sex with attention âšī¸
Doesn’t there have to be attention to get sex?đ¤
@suzianne saidCall you Paranoidia. Call you Narcissistica.
That was entirely FMF's fault.
I saw the comments earlier talking about "no sense of humor". Give me a break.
The thread started with humor and FMF just HAD to derail it into what you unsurprisingly call "personal character assassination". He caused this. It did not start that way. It was HIS intent to make it so. What he is doing to the General Forum happened bef ...[text shortened]... hem, is the same thing that happened to the SF. Same architects, same result.
Call me Cassandra.
05 Jul 21
@drewnogal saidDo not, under any circumstances, let my wife know that some actually last that(3 min)...please.đ¤Ģ
Some of us get attention, some of us get sex đ
For longer than 3 mins too đŽ
05 Jul 21
@drewnogal saidDamn. Another bubble burst.đĄ
Yes but don’t assume you’ll get sex with attention âšī¸
05 Jul 21
@great-big-stees saidPerhaps an invite here for a chat with some bold independent women?
Do not, under any circumstances, let my wife know that some actually last that(3 min)...please.đ¤Ģ