Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo you haven't answered it. At one point you said it was not intended to be funny. But then you said it was sarcasm. If it was deliberately unfunny sarcasm what was its purpose, and whatever its purpose was, did the subsequent "sincere" apology extend to that as well?
sorry i have already answered this and its tedious to have to repeat the same things again and again, next question please.
10 Sep 15
Originally posted by FMFyou are asking me the purpose of sarcasm? to be sarcastic!! and yes i have answered your tedious question.
No you haven't answered it. At one point you said it was not intended to be funny. But then you said it was sarcasm. If it was deliberately unfunny sarcasm what was its purpose, and whatever its purpose was, did the subsequent "sincere" apology extend to that as well?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut if you read what you wrote, it mentioned the apology, look... "Awe diddums are you still sore cause that bad ol puddy cat robbie called you a 'son of Satan', there there it will be ok, il get to him to issue a public apology, how about that, will it make you feel better?" It actually mentions the apology that you then gave supposedly with sincerity. How can you say "it wasn't any part of the apology"? It seems peculiar.
what are you drooling about? it wasn't any part of the apology. I have already told you that twice you tedious man.
10 Sep 15
Originally posted by FMFYes i am sure it does but then again you think that retrospectively casting thing up from the past so as to confront and embarrass people in order to humiliate and sadisticly publically scourge them (figuratively) is just fine and dandy, if anyone knows peculiar then you da man!
But if you read what you wrote, it mentioned the apology, look... "Awe diddums are you still sore cause that bad ol puddy cat robbie called you a 'son of Satan', there there it will be ok, il get to him to issue a public apology, how about that, will it make you feel better?" It actually mentions the apology that you then gave supposedly with sincerity. How can you say "it wasn't any part of the apology"? It seems peculiar.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre you complaining about me "retrospectively casting [some]thing up" from page 8 or 9 of this thread?
Yes i am sure it does but then again you think that retrospectively casting thing up from the past so as to confront and embarrass people in order to humiliate and sadisticly publically scourge them (figuratively) is just fine and dandy, if anyone knows peculiar then you da man!
robbie, here are your two consecutive post addressed to divegeester, presented one after the other: "Awe diddums are you still sore cause that bad ol puddy cat robbie called you a 'son of Satan', there there it will be ok, il get to him to issue a public apology, how about that, will it make you feel better? Sorry geester for calling you a 'son of Satan' but i had to make sure cause a lot of false christians going about these days."
Is it unfair of me to put the two posts one after the other like that?
Originally posted by FMFDude you like to sadisticly scourge people and you're asking me what is fair???? its like
robbie, here are your two consecutive post addressed to divegeester, presented one after the other: [b]"Awe diddums are you still sore cause that bad ol puddy cat robbie called you a 'son of Satan', there there it will be ok, il get to him to issue a public apology, how about that, will it make you feel better? Sorry geester for calling you a 'son of Satan' but ...[text shortened]... about these days."
Is it unfair of me to put the two posts one after the other like that?[/b]
being asked by a psycho killer what's the proper attire for dinner.
