I’m thinking of forming a new clique

@drewnogal said
There’s some resentment that Duchess and Suzianne didn’t want to believe I had proof of Stella’s wrongdoing because they are women who always claim to be supportive of other women. As for Lotte21 she’s not being subjected to anything more than what I got when I first boldly stepped into the General Forum. It took me 3 pages to prove who I said I was whereas Lotte21 prefers to just sit back and enjoy the fireworks.

You are misrepresenting me. Perhaps dive told you to say that to bolster his claim that I don't have all the info, but I was one of the ones calling for Stella's banning. This has nothing to do with Lotte21, which is the entire point I'm trying to make here. Bringing up Stella is a total red herring. It makes me wonder why he wants to treat supposition like fact. In fact, this "johnnylongwoody" was not even in the conversation until FMF brought him into it as a diversion. Now Dive is all over that, going so far as to accuse Lotte21 of being him (and Stella). This whole case is more complex than Dive or FMF want to make it.

But it's simply not true that I "didn’t want to believe" Stella's wrongdoing. I confronted her point-blank and asked why she uploaded porn to the site. I always thought she should be banned the minute the admins had proof.

I'm just not sure why dive and FMF want to push another narrative.

@suzianne said
Perhaps dive told you to say that to bolster his claim that I don't have all the info,

Drewnogsl and I have not conversed at all over this.

@suzianne said
This has nothing to do with Lotte21, which is the entire point I'm trying to make here.

Your inability to read what has been written is astonishing. Drewnogal has explained how the two are one and the same.

@divegeester said
You are mistaken.

The pornography in question was of the real extreme hard-core type and was posted by a MALE in their profile to abuse a female member of this website while playing chess with her. To do this results in an instant and permanent ban for the person not just the user profile.

It is not acceptable for a poster of this type to resume activity under a ...[text shortened]... the seriousness of this abuse nor the integrity to support the victims.

It’s as simple as that.

AGAIN, you are misrepresenting the facts. As I just explained to Drew, "Suzianne and Duchess64 have chosen to disbelieve drewnogal’s statement". is a LIE. I believed Drew from the start. What I do NOT condone, is YOU, bullying another paying member of this site over your own pathetic accusations. I have never attacked Drewnogal over any of this.

As I told her, what's curious is why you are pushing a false narrative.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

It is revealing to observe you going through whatever contortions it takes in order to maintain your partisan position. Why you cannot support women on this website who are being abused by a male is beyond me.

@suzianne said
AGAIN, you are misrepresenting the facts. As I just explained to Drew, "Suzianne and Duchess64 have chosen to disbelieve drewnogal’s statement". is a LIE. I believed Drew from the start. What I do NOT condone, is YOU, bullying another paying member of this site over your own pathetic accusations. I have never attacked Drewnogal over any of this.

As I told her, what's curious is why you are pushing a false narrative.

No one has been bullied. I have called out the abuser in public when they are posting in public using 2 different profiles. It can be totally proven (if Russ wishes to do so) that these profile are the same person. I know for absolute fact that they are.

It really isn’t complicated.

@suzianne said
You are misrepresenting me. Perhaps dive told you to say that to bolster his claim that I don't have all the info, but I was one of the ones calling for Stella's banning. This has nothing to do with Lotte21, which is the entire point I'm trying to make here. Bringing up Stella is a total red herring. It makes me wonder why he wants to treat supposition like fact. In fac ...[text shortened]... otte21 of being him (and Stella). This whole case is more complex than Dive or FMF want to make it.

I think Stella and Lotte21 are one in the same. I also think they are both the same poster as used Phil O'[something] earlier this year, and johnnylongwoody longer ago.

@suzianne said
But it's simply not true that I "didn’t want to believe" Stella's wrongdoing. I confronted her point-blank and asked why she uploaded porn to the site. I always thought she should be banned the minute the admins had proof.

I don't remember it this way. I DO remember you using the "Stella" thread to attack divegeester though.

@suzianne said
In fact, this "johnnylongwoody" was not even in the conversation until FMF brought him into it as a diversion. Now Dive is all over that, going so far as to accuse Lotte21 of being him (and Stella).

Yes he was. Drewnogal will explain it to you if she chooses to. There is more to this than you are aware.

Why you cannot accept people at their word and support an effort to prevent women being abused here is past my understanding of you.

@suzianne said

I'm just not sure why dive and FMF want to push another narrative.

There is no “other narrative” you simply don’t know all the facts and I know more about it than you do.

You would do well to relax and trust people over this instead of making yourself appear uncaring and partisan.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I think drewnogal handled the Stella situation well and in a way that was beneficial to the community