01 Oct 16
1 edit
Here is an interesting read from Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Arthur - quoting many different sources about this king, some of which concluding that he was a myth rather than a historical figure.
I'm adding an article not quite as comprehensive http://www.biography.com/people/king-arthur-9190042.
Originally posted by chaney3Difficult to know for sure but certainly not real in the sense of the known lineage of kings and queens of England. He is probably mostly myth. Some say his castle was at Tintagel. Other say that dragons lived in the caves of the north Cornish coastline.
I recently watched a documentary on King Arthur questioning whether he was real, or a myth.
Considering the English on this site, what do you think?
01 Oct 16
Originally posted by divegeesterThanks Dive.
Difficult to know for sure but certainly not real in the sense of the known lineage of kings and queens of England. He is probably mostly myth. Some say his castle was at Tintagel. Other say that dragons lived in the caves of the north Cornish coastline.
C'mon Robbie, Ghost, FMF, what is your take on this?
01 Oct 16
Originally posted by divegeesterMost of the story was probably simply made up 600 years after he was supposed to have lived.
Difficult to know for sure but certainly not real in the sense of the known lineage of kings and queens of England. He is probably mostly myth. Some say his castle was at Tintagel. Other say that dragons lived in the caves of the north Cornish coastline.
