Originally posted by robbie carrobieI'm not interested in you retracting anything, I've said this already. I'm just amused at your bizarre definition of 'religious bigotry'.
Provide the evidence and ill retract the statement, otherwise is stands, heck post any statement where you have made any positive comment about anyone's religious beliefs and ill retract the statement.
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFhere is his statement here
Criticizing you and your organization, opposing your practices, not supporting you, not saying nice things about what you say and believe, is not restricting your freedom of religion.
I fully support everyone in their desire to worship as they see fit.
this is falsehood. He does not support us in our desire to worship as we see fit.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat has he ever advocated that might prevent you from worshipping as you see fit? I cannot remember him barracking for any restriction on your freedom other than supporting the government's right to step in to protect children, which even you have accepted.
So you cannot provide a single iota where he fully supports us in our freedom to worship as we see fit, thankyou, why can you not provide it because its a lie, he does not support us in worshipping as we see fit. He is a religious bigot.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHe said "I fully support everyone in their desire to worship as they see fit." That's a pretty unequivocal statement. Not bad from a poster who is highly critical of you and your organization. What more support do you want?
here is his statement here
I fully support everyone in their desire to worship as they see fit.
this is falsehood. He does not support us in our desire to worship as we see fit.
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI find it bizarre that I fit this description just because I've never said anything nice about JW's. You're comedy gold, I'll give you that. There we go, that's something positive.
bizarre, it was taken directly from wikipedia, probably posted there by some whacked out nerd no doubt.
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFI know what he said and its demonstrably false, i have provided specific instances where he does not support all in their desire to worship as they please. Infcat his entire posting history is exactly the opposite, of criticizing others for they way they see fit to worship. He's a religious bigot the sooner you accept it the better.
He said "I fully support everyone in their desire to worship as they see fit." That's a pretty unequivocal statement. Not bad from a poster who is highly critical of you and your organization. What more support do you want?
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat restrictions or limitations has he proposed? I cannot remember a single one. If you can, say so.
I know what he said and its demonstrably false, i have provided specific instances where he does not support all in their desire to worship as they please.
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFHe does not support our stance on anything i provided specific examples, numerous times and will not do so again. Here is his statement again
What restrictions or limitations has he proposed? I cannot remember a single one. If you can, say so.
I fully support everyone in their desire to worship as they see fit.
Demonstrably false.
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNot supporting your stance on anything is not the same as seeking to prevent you from worshipping as you see fit or from exercising your desire to do so.
He does not support our stance on anything i provided specific examples, numerous times and will not do so again. Here is his statement again
I fully support everyone in their desire to worship as they see fit.
Demonstrably false.