Go back
Memo

Memo

General

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
19 Jan 16
1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
What "enemies" do you mean and why do you think they "hope for" damage?
All those people that you have stalked and bullied and fabricated values against. Why hope for damage? because no one like to see the perpetration of injustice.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
19 Jan 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you have produced no reason, no arguments, all you have achieved is proving what a rather unsavory person you really are. I do not moralize over you for it, you were caught by your own words, trying desperately to find a pretext with which to stigmatize your enemies. It didn't work out for you dude, you have lost, but there will be other battles th ...[text shortened]... drivel again and again in the hope that if you repeat it enough times it will become believable.
The issue isn't settled because you defended the cover up of sex abuse by your organization for page after page and you have stated that you do not retract what you said.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
19 Jan 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
All those people that you have stalked and bullied and fabricated vales against. Why hope for damage? because no one like to see the perpetration of injustice.
You say I have "stalked" people? On a message board where everything everyone says is out in the open and the whole point of the arena is for people to debate, discuss, and engage what others say? How can it possibly be described as "stalking" except as a kind of hyperbolic joke on your part?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
19 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
The issue isn't settled because you defended the cover up of sex abuse by your organization for page after page and you have stated that you do not retract what you said.
Dude you keep repeating the same lie again and again as if by doing so it will become real. Have you no self respect? flip sake I thought it was undignified enough for you when you were presented with empirical evidence which refuted your lie and here you are trying to blot out the evidence by repeating the same lie over and over and over again. It wont make it any more real dude, you have lost.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
19 Jan 16
1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
You say I have "stalked" people? On a message board where everything everyone says is out in the open and the whole point of the arena is for people to debate, discuss, and engage what others say? How can it possibly be described as "stalking" except as a kind of hyperbolic joke on your part?
Yes you stalk GB from thread to thread and forum to forum and have been on his case for months now. GB just has to post and you are there chomping at the bit, trying to make his life here a miserable one.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
19 Jan 16
1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Dude you keep repeating the same lie again and again as if by doing so it will become real. Have you no self respect? flip sake I thought it was undignified enough for you when you were presented with empirical evidence which refuted your lie and here you are trying to blot out the evidence by repeating the same lie over and over and over again. It wont make it any more real dude, you have lost.
Thread 162947.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
19 Jan 16
3 edits

Originally posted by FMF
Thread 162947.
Is that the thread in which I posted 65 times and you still cannot find a single quotation to substantiate your claim. Oh dear, people will begin to think you made it up😵

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
19 Jan 16
1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes you stalk GB from thread to thread and forum to forum and have been on his case for months now.
I have had forum exchanges with dozens and dozens of community members, including Grampy Bobby, over the last few months, and more interaction probably with regular posters - like him - who post a lot than I do with posters who contribute less often.

The word "stalk" is a preposterous pejorative term you bandy about to poison the well. "Stalking" is stuff like when people try to find out people's 'real word' addresses and drop hints that they might track them down, or when people pester others in PMs away from public scrutiny. Your abuse words like "sinister", "creepy" and "stalker" mean nothing, not least because you repeat them so bizarrely often - over and over again even repeating them in several posts in a row in what sound like streams of consciousness.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
19 Jan 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Is that the thread in which I posted 65 times and you still cannot find a single quotation to substantiate your claim. Oh dear, people will begin to think you made it up😵
I don't think people who read it will think I've made anything up at all.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
19 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
I have had forum exchanges with dozens and dozens of community members, including Grampy Bobby, over the last few months, and more interaction probably with regular posters who post a lot than I do with posters that contribute less often. The word "stalk" is a preposterous pejorative term you band about to poison the well. "Stalking" is when people try to find o ...[text shortened]... n nothing, not least because you repeat them over and over again even in several posts in a row.
Gee I dunno dude we could make an examination of your posts and the frequency which which you seem to apply yourself to GB's posts in comparison to those of other people. I dare say we will find a bias. Shall we employ the scientific method?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
19 Jan 16
1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
I don't think people who read it will think I've made anything up at all.
You don't think your inability to cite a single reference in support of your claim is rather devastating to your case? I do, infact its evidence of your slobbery drooliness.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
19 Jan 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Gee I dunno dude we could make an examination of your posts and the frequency which which you seem to apply yourself to GB's posts in comparison to those of other people. I dare say we will find a bias. Shall we employ the scientific method?
It seems you don't really know what the word "stalking" refers to. You seem to just throw it in as part of the insult-word-salad.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
19 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
It seems you don't really know what the word "stalking" refers to. You seem to just throw it in as part of the insult-word-salad.
hehe , i like that, insult word salad 😵

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
19 Jan 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You don't think your inability to cite a single reference in support of your claim is rather devastating to your case? I do, infact its evidence of your slobbery drooliness.
People can just read it for themselves. And they can remind themselves as they do it: 'robbie said he doesn't retract any of this, apparently, but he also er.. said he condemns the cover up of sex abuse by his organization, apparently.'

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
19 Jan 16
1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
People can just read it for themselves. And they can remind themselves as they do it: 'robbie said he doesn't retract any of this, apparently, but he also er.. said he condemns the cover up of sex abuse by his organization, apparently.'
or that can believe your lies, hmmmm, lies or chips, lies or chips?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.