27 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFactually the thread was a simple statement publicly letting people know that he was not renewing his subscription or starting anymore threads, It was not a mandate to make references to him in any other way. So no you cannot explain your stalking and harassment in this way, in fact i cannot find a single post were you do actually specifically mention his reluctance to subscribe.
The thread's topic is Grampy Bobby.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's a thread started by Grampy Bobby about himself. You can hardly complain about people making reference to him.
actually the thread was a simple statement publicly letting people know that he was not renewing his subscription or starting anymore threads, It was not a mandate to make references to him in any other way. So no you cannot explain your stalking and harassment in this way, in fact i cannot find a single post were you do actually specifically mention his reluctance to subscribe.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFYes but when we examine his posts the evidence is contrary to your claims. The majority of divegeesters posts in comparison to others are disproportionately directed at GB, way more than anyone else with the exception of you of course. Once again evidence makes a mockery of your ragged and beggarly claims.
divegeester is no more "obsessed" with Grampy Bobby than you and Suzianne are "obsessed" with me and divegeester.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePeople can talk to whoever they want on a message board like this. The word "stalking" is meaningless the way you use it. From you it's just an attempted insult.
Yes but when we examine his posts the evidence is contrary to your claims. The majority of divegeesters posts in comparison to others are disproportionately directed at GB, way more than anyone else with the exception of you of course. Once again evidence makes a mockery of your ragged and beggarly claims.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFYou do not mention any reasons why GB is not subscribing, infact all you do is take the opportunity to attack him form the very outset. He mentions that he is not renewing his subscription and you tell him to start a blog. So I reject your ludicrous claims that you were on topic, clearly you were not on topic and all you did was use the occasion to stalk and harass him as your posting history here demonstrates.
It's a thread started by Grampy Bobby about himself. You can hardly complain about people making reference to him.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFNo its not because the evidence in the thread suggests that you have been doing just that. Infcat it strongly suggest that you are obsessively stalking and harassing him.
People can talk to whoever they want on a message board like this. The word "stalking" is meaningless the way you use it. From you it's just an attempted insult.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieGrampy Bobby himself, here on his own thread, has posted many dozens of times without mentioning the subscription issue, and has also posted a fair bit of material with the obvious purpose of attacking fellow posters.
You do not mention any reasons why GB is not subscribing, infact all you do is take the opportunity to attack him form the very outset.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFI have not provided any evidence other than your own posts, they are there for all to see, you have a huge disproportionate amount of posts directed towards the person of GB.
robbie, according to your own definition of the word, are you "stalking" me now?
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt doesn't matter how many times you repeat the words "stalking" and "harassing", other than how it might start to seem that it is exactly what you are doing here to me - by your own definition, not mine.
No its not because the evidence in the thread suggests that you have been doing just that. Infcat it strongly suggest that you are obsessively stalking and harassing him.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFare you denying that you entered the thread with the sole objective of attacking him? you were not interested in why he was not subscribing, all you could say was, get a blog, Is that not the case?
Grampy Bobby himself, here on his own thread, has posted many dozens of times without mentioning the subscription issue, and has also posted a fair bit of material with the obvious purpose of attacking fellow posters.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePeople who dislike you might think that a disproportionate amount of your posts are directed towards me. That's fine if they want to think that way. If they were to use the word "stalking" to attack your posting record, I would not agree with them.
I have not provided any evidence other than your own posts, they are there for all to see, you have a huge disproportionate amount of posts directed towards the person of GB.