@ghost-of-a-duke saidNot interested in your links.
Not interested in your links. When you protest about Rusty directing posts to you several times a day it is blatantly the case that you do exactly the same thing to Kelly, a poster who hasn't replied to you in years.
Well, the conversation between us at that link answers your criticism and explains how it is not "exactly the same thing"; if you are "not interested", so be it.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidyou protest about Rusty directing posts to you several times a day
Not interested in your links. When you protest about Rusty directing posts to you several times a day it is blatantly the case that you do exactly the same thing to Kelly, a poster who hasn't replied to you in years.
I commented on it; where did I "protest"? Both Very Rusty and KellyJay can do what they want.
@fmf saidYou don't reply to Rusty, but he directs posts at you anyway.
Not interested in your links.
Well, the conversation between us at that link answers your criticism and explains how it is not "exactly the same thing"; if you are "not intetested", so be it.
Kelly doesn't reply to you, but you direct posts at him anyway.
Exactly the same. It is only your ego that has you think your posts directed towards someone who wants nothing to do with you are somehow more valid than Rustys.
To avoid you dropping into dj2becker mode, just see Thread 198383 page 40 onwards. The answer to the point you are making is found in our conversation at that link.
@fmf saidThe majority of your posts in the SF are directed at a poster who wants nothing to do with you and hasn't responded to you for years. That's the bottom line.
you protest about Rusty directing posts to you several times a day
I commented on it; where did I "protest"? Both Very Rusty and KellyJay can do what they want.
Leave the guy alone.
@ghost-of-a-duke said💯
You don't reply to Rusty, but he directs posts at you anyway.
Kelly doesn't reply to you, but you direct posts at him anyway.
Exactly the same. It is only your ego that has you think your posts directed towards someone who wants nothing to do with you are somehow more valid than Rustys.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidHe's free to do so.
This could easily have been posted by Kelly in the SF. You get that, right?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou are willing to repeat the criticism. I am not willing to type my response again. So, if you are genuinely interested, see Thread 198383 page 40 onwards.
The majority of your posts in the SF are directed at a poster who wants nothing to do with you and hasn't responded to you for years. That's the bottom line.
Leave the guy alone.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidLeave the guy alone.
The majority of your posts in the SF are directed at a poster who wants nothing to do with you and hasn't responded to you for years. That's the bottom line.
Leave the guy alone.
Is this your advice to Very Rusty as well?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI don't think so, no. Refer to our conversation at the link I gave you.
So exactly the same, hey?