General
10 Aug 22
@divegeester saidNice try.
I just did, in the post you are replying to.
Have another coffee Susi.
Now try to not be so obvious with what you're doing.
13 Aug 22
@suzianne saidBut Relentless Red has explicitly said that he made the accusation in support of Ghost of a Duke. And he also suggested that what he claims I did to him is "evidence" supporting what Ghost of a Duke claims about me. Have you not read this thread?
First of all, it wasn't an "accusation", as he himself said. And he was not "explicit"ly accusing anybody, and he did not make his non-accusation "to support" Ghost of a Duke in any coincidental "dispute" with anybody.
13 Aug 22
@divegeester saidOooooooh...if you're forced to resort to an unlikely legal threat: You've lost the argument.
Perfect post by you, thank you!
Because neither does Relentless Red. And that is where the gutless little weasel could now be in a bit of deep water.
Easier just to say it: "I surrender!"
.
13 Aug 22
@divegeester saidHypocrite.
Has the spineless coward Relentless Red nominated you to be his mouthpiece now?
Anyway, if you are going to grab this legal dog by the ears you should probably undertake a little more diligence rather than bemoan the amount of posts you have to go through.
My sincere advice to you would be to stay well out of it.
13 Aug 22
@fmf saidWhy are you so adamant about defending yourself against a non-accusation?
Surely Relentless Red's kafkaesque accusation relies on his claim that there is some sinister meaning in an alleged coincidence? Why do you think I have to defend myself against such a ludicrous and unsubstantiated accusation?
13 Aug 22
@divegeester saidYou must be reading a different forum.
Have you got any evidence to support this slanderous slur of criminal behaviour against FMF?
@suzianne saidThe issue is Relentless Red's behaviour. Do you think I hijacked one of his email accounts and used it to destroy his Facebook group? I don't think he does either; I think this is all just toxic banter. So, it's this behaviour on his part that is the issue.
Why are you so adamant about defending yourself against a non-accusation?