28 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidRelationships in the workplace where there is no power dynamic don't seem to me to be an ethical problem.
Again, %15 of relationships begin in the workplace. (Many, I'd imagine, occurring over time, without a predatory element).
28 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI haven't claimed to be "an authority on the subject".
And yet one day later you are an authority on the subject and can, with confidence, label Philip Schofield a predator.
@fmf saidQuite. You have shown yourself to be wholly deficient in knowledge on the matter.
I haven't claimed to be "an authority on the subject".
Your position that even if a subordinate instigates a relationship, the person in the position of power is still a predator due to the associated taboo of such a relationship is frankly bizarre.
28 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt isn't wishy-washy when used to label unethical behaviour unequivocally. To claim the word is wishy-washy is arguably a sign that you are assuming a wishy-washy stance with regard to the ethics in question.
It merely demonstrates what a wishy-washy term 'taboo' is.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI disagree.
Quite. You have shown yourself to be wholly deficient in knowledge on the matter.
28 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWell, if the powerful person's dynamic with the subordinate involves sex, then I think there is an ethical problem.
Many relationships in the workplace have a power dynamic.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI disagree.
Your position that even if a subordinate instigates a relationship, the person in the position of power is still a predator due to the associated taboo of such a relationship is frankly bizarre.
28 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke said"Aliens"?
What if the relationship is mutually wanted and results in marriage and a future offspring who saves the planet from unethical aliens?