Poll validation numbers

@very-rusty said
I told him one day you've become what I use to be like.

He didn't believe me, but obviously others are seeing it too.

-VR

@fmf said
I wanted to choose EIGHT. I wanted EIGHT to be an option. I think EIGHT is the correct number, not FIVE or TEN.

@moonbus said
Naw, with eight, there's the possibility of a hung jury. I'd say seven. Yeah , seven. That way, no matter what the split, there'd be a clear winner.

@divegeester said
The recent disturbance in the force was not at all helped by the RHP equivalent of “stop the steal”, so I thought I’d set my own poll to garner opinion to input into the new rules which may be forthcoming on Poll validation.

Please vote for the option which best fits your opinion. Thank you.

[poll]1ACA78A7926CC363AAAE15BDFECADC69[/poll]

@fmf said
I say EIGHT.

Because EIGHT is how many there were in the most recent valid smooth significant poll that's been run.

I only recently learned that Australia has compulsory voting, with rather lenient fines compared to Brazil.

I think that might be a great idea for the USA, but maybe not for RHP.

However, maybe we could require that anyone who votes in an RHP poll does so while wearing Budgy Smugglers.

@moonbus said
Naw, with eight, there's the possibility of a hung jury. I'd say seven. Yeah , seven. That way, no matter what the split, there'd be a clear winner.

@the-gravedigger said
It was FMF who had his brain removed not dive.

@kevin-eleven said
Reportedly -- but I'm not sure we should trust Dive's scriptures any more than the ones he rails against in a certain other forum.

@the-gravedigger said
It was FMF who had his brain removed not dive.

@divegeester said
What are you on about now woofpoof?

😂

@fmf said
Agreed. Seven it is then.

@fmf said
Agreed. Seven it is then.

@moonbus said
I also suggest that one of the options always be 'dither' -- for people who have trouble with commitment (fence-sitters, agnostics, etc.).

@moonbus said
I also suggest that one of the options always be 'dither' -- for people who have trouble with commitment (fence-sitters, agnostics, etc.). Any further thoughts on the matter?