@very-rusty saidIf Camilla were not a woman or did not deserve the same respect as other women there would be no moment to which my sentence refers?! That moment being central to the thesis I put forward?!?
Camilla isn't a woman? Does she not deserve the same respect as any other woman?
-VR
@petewxyz saidThen Suzie Q should give her the same respect she gives other women. Isn't she all about womens rights?
If Camilla were not a woman or did not deserve the same respect as other women there would be no moment to which my sentence refers?! That moment being central to the thesis I put forward?!?
-VR
@very-rusty saidI will show the courtesy of an answer, but I won't repeat my original comment which already addresses your question. Just read it again!
Then Suzie Q should give her the same respect she gives other women. Isn't she all about womens rights?
-VR
@petewxyz saidI don't think Suzianne cares about or pursues "high standards" of discourse. I think she is the other-side-of-the-US-retail-politics-aisle counterpart of Earl of Trumps, Mott the Hoople and whodey. She is a creature of the Trumpian world. What "high standards"?
I thought you were emphasising the moment because she cares about high standards in a world that has serious difficulties treating women appropriately.
@petewxyz saidTry making some sense I read it once which was enough. You don't have an answer!
I will show the courtesy of an answer, but I won't repeat my original comment which already addresses your question. Just read it again!
-VR