Originally posted by Chopper 85no problem,easy mistakes.
Oh sorry about that.
i advise you this, do not bring up old history and look for a fight...and we are a friendly comunitee and will not be happy with it, but we welcome you and wish you all the best in your games and stuff.
Reagards
Zoe.
Originally posted by TDR1don`t think his age is ten.
he was very nice to me.......he was only a ten year old kid who didnt know what to say......i dont no much about the situation b/c i have been grounded for a week and not here but cant u also be banned for creating more than one account...several subscribing players have done that(not mentioning anyone but we no who they are) and they werent banned....shouldnt ever infraction of the terms of services be followed up by being banned?
I won't comment on his age, but I just want to say there is slightly more to this case than I can make public here. So please, no more discussion about this one.
Very few people have been barred from the site in the past, and it is very rare for subscribers to be barred. When it does happen, I try to announce the reason that an individual was removed, if it is at all possible.
-Russ
Originally posted by Russ
I won't comment on his age, but I just want to say there is slightly more to this case than I can make public here. So please, no more discussion about this one.
Very few people have been barred from the site in the past, and it is very rare for subscribers to be barred. When it does happen, I try to announce the reason that an individual was removed, if it is at all possible.
-Russ
Hi Russ.
Just a note. Could there exists a comprehensive (perhaps even over complicated) list of no-no's ? Don't get me wrong, the forums are in general pretty decent, but I have no idea what constitutes 'flaming' and not flaming, specifically as you delete the post before we see it.
I would particularly appreciate this as we all seem a bit in the dark regarding what we should 'report' , or when a forum user crosses the line.
thanks
Originally posted by pcaspianRuss can speak for himself, but for me, if a curseword has a purpose that accentuates a point I don't have a problem with it. Someone asked Chris Rock about profanity in his routines and he said it served the purpose of "punctuation." I think the line is drawn with comments that are abusive or cruel. These serve to harm the overall community on this site as it degenerates into name-calling. This takes away from the positive intent that the creators of the site desired to make. It's their "party" and they have a right to be the "bouncers."
Originally posted by Russ
[b]I won't comment on his age, but I just want to say there is slightly more to this case than I can make public here. So please, no more discussion about this one.
Very few people have been barred from the site in the past, and it is very rare for subscribers to be barred. When it does happen, I try to announce the re ...[text shortened]... dark regarding what we should 'report' , or when a forum user crosses the line.
thanks
Originally posted by pcaspianno-i don't think that's very suitable as people will attempt to tread the line...witht he current system, it's the community that decides what acceptable or not, and-IMO-this is best...
Originally posted by Russ
[b]I won't comment on his age, but I just want to say there is slightly more to this case than I can make public here. So please, no more discussion about this one.
Very few people have been barred from the site in the past, and it is very rare for subscribers to be barred. When it does happen, I try to announce the re ...[text shortened]... dark regarding what we should 'report' , or when a forum user crosses the line.
thanks