Go back
same points won for a checkmate and a timeout

same points won for a checkmate and a timeout

General

L
Cruel sun

20°53' N, 156°40' W

Joined
11 Jan 05
Moves
14520
Clock
17 Nov 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't know what's going on...

I rewrite my idea.

I want to know if it will be a good idea to introduce a factor K to reduce the numbers of points won by time-out. If the opponent doesn't move, because he wants to leave the plateforme (what a strange idea) or because he is too busy on the real life to finish his games, why should I have the same numbers of points as if I won the victory by checkmate?

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Lahaina
I think it is too easy to win by time-out, so I propose to have a factor K (with 0
What?

Ragnorak
For RHP addons...

tinyurl.com/yssp6g

Joined
16 Mar 04
Moves
15013
Clock
17 Nov 05
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
What?
..."less than symbol" don't know what's next.

Forum cuts posts after less than symbol followed by number???

D

h

Joined
09 Jun 04
Moves
39731
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
..."less than symbol" don't know what's next.

Forum cuts posts after less than symbol followed by number???

D
is that tru

Ragnorak
For RHP addons...

tinyurl.com/yssp6g

Joined
16 Mar 04
Moves
15013
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
is that tru
Yes, it is. The probability that I am wrong on this is

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
17 Nov 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Rea

EDIT: This is killing my mind.

As for the idea itself it's crap. A win is a win. What's to stop players who are losing letting games timeout so they lose less points?

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Lahaina
I think it is too easy to win by time-out, so I propose to have a factor K (with 0
That's absurd if K was

C
Oro!

Fear The Cow

Joined
23 Nov 01
Moves
34289
Clock
17 Nov 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Rea

EDIT: This is killing my mind.

As for the idea itself it's crap. A win is a win. What's to stop players who are losing letting games timeout so they lose less points?
Agreed!

A win is a win. Why should I get less points just cause my opponent was to lazy to send me a message asking me not time them out? If i`m losing a game horribly I should just let it time to spite my opponent?

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
670007
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

just adding to the thread:

The looser can loose more points than the winner wins, if uit came to taht. But then we would need a big brother to distinguish between timout by actual problems and timout by lazyness...

But on that point I like the idea that a stalemate counts as loss for the stalemating player 🙂

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ponderable
But on that point I like the idea that a stalemate counts as loss for the stalemating player 🙂
Well then you like crappy ideas.

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think you should get extra points for having more pieces at the end. So if I have 9 queens, 2 rooks, 2 Bishops and 7,000 knights I would factor K x 10 to the third and get way more points than you when all you have left is a pawn and no king

Next, I would get my extra pieces from the last game as mercenaries, until I filled 17 chessboards. Remember not to steal my great ideas.

P-

h

Joined
09 Jun 04
Moves
39731
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I think you should get extra points for having more pieces at the end. So if I have 9 queens, 2 rooks, 2 Bishops and 7,000 knights I would factor K x 10 to the third and get way more points than you when all you have left is a pawn and no king

Next, I would get my extra pieces from the last game as mercenaries, until I filled 17 chessboards. Remember not to steal my great ideas.

P-
I think we should also get a third colour... grey. If my grey knight takes a black queen then it turns into a grey knightqueen and can hop all over the dimensions.

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
I think we should also get a third colour... grey. If my grey knight takes a black queen then it turns into a grey knightqueen and can hop all over the dimensions.
I think it's a better idea for me to get the grey pieces... and I can also control yours.

P-

h

Joined
09 Jun 04
Moves
39731
Clock
17 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I think it's a better idea for me to get the grey pieces... and I can also control yours.

P-
You can only control my pieces if your king lands on the tiananmen square.

P
Banned from edits

Grammar dyslexic

Joined
20 May 05
Moves
11372
Clock
17 Nov 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I think it's a better idea for me to get the grey pieces... and I can also control yours.

P-
Or maybe a black and white striped piece, like a zebra, that both side can move when its their turn.

-Note to smart people- I didn't think about the idea, so it could have potential or it could be ridiculously stupid. Either way, that was what i was going for 😉

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.