02 Apr 15
FMF to hate evil is quite normal. So there is no explanation necessary, and hesse did not intend to propose that.
However it happens that we dislike persons (and I will look up the original quaote sionce I think that "hate" is probably not correct translated), and we wonder why, and the the quote is quite correct. I have often observed that people can't stand their own weaknesses in others.
Cheers!
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhereas some people are hated because they don't have any "themselves" to honestly refer to, and have to resort to copying other people's (or wikis' ) words in a desperate attempt to sound "deep".
"Some people are hated just because they are being themselves and being honest and truthful." -ChessPraxis
[25 Apr '12 in "Why some people are disliked..."] Your thoughts on whether his insight still applies today?
02 Apr 15
Originally posted by rookie54"If you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself.
nice quote...
do you think it to be so???
What isn't part of ourselves doesn't disturb us." ~Hermann Hesse
_______________________
The first question is what did Hesse mean by "part of yourself". which appears to be an implied reference to an individual's norms and standards of morality or conscience. If respect for the person and property and freedom of others is part of these standards, violations such as rape or murder or theft or refusal to recognize the freedom of others would become the object of "hate". If those standards are not present, then the same violations wouldn't "disturb" that same individual.
Substituting the word "criticize" for "hate" in the same quote: "If you [criticize] a person, you [criticize] something in him that is part of yourself. What isn't part of ourselves doesn't disturb us." (because you're already aware of and recognize these shortcomings in yourself) would make literal sense without speculation over his meaning of "part of yourself".
Second question is what meaning did Hesse attach to the word "hate" which at this point would require further speculation and/or online search; though I did find one of his quotes on love and another on character: "Love does not entreat; or demand. Love must have the strength to become certain within itself. Then it ceases merely to be attracted and begins to attract." "People with courage and character always seem sinister to the rest." ~Hermann Hesse
My own perspective regarding both "hate" and its antonym "love": a) Love requires concentration and objectivity which involve patience and sustained rational thought; b) Succumbing to subjective hatred reflects the malfunction of thought becoming subservient to raw emotion which is antithetical to love. c) All of the heinous criminal activity and the atrocities associated with terrorist campaigns in today's world are of course to be rejected as aberrations of normal human behavior; those committing them deserve prosecution to the full extent of the law. d) Courage to see reality steady and to see it whole requires vision and grace under fire, not the brain melt pettiness of allowing hate to fixate on other people.
"A loving person lives in a loving world. A hostile person lives in a hostile world: everyone you meet is your mirror." Ken Keyes Jr. / "Life is a solitary cell whose walls are mirrors." -Eugene O'Neill ... rookie, thanks for your reply.
02 Apr 15
Originally posted by Ponderable"I have often observed that people can't stand their own weaknesses in others." Well said, Ponderable.
FMF to hate evil is quite normal. So there is no explanation necessary, and hesse did not intend to propose that.
However it happens that we dislike persons (and I will look up the original quaote sionce I think that "hate" is probably not correct translated), and we wonder why, and the the quote is quite correct. I have often observed that people can't stand their own weaknesses in others.
Cheers!
Originally posted by Grampy Bobbygovernor pence, governor pence!!!
"If you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself.
What isn't part of ourselves doesn't disturb us." ~Hermann Hesse
_______________________
The first question is what did Hesse mean by "part of yourself". which appears to be an implied reference to an individual's norms and standards of morality or conscience. If respect fo ...[text shortened]... is a solitary cell whose walls are mirrors." -Eugene O'Neill ... rookie, thanks for your reply.
it's a question that can be answered yes or no!!!
stop with the ole soft shoe and answer the dang question!!!
02 Apr 15
Originally posted by rookie54Originally posted by rookie54 (Page 2)
governor pence, governor pence!!!
it's a question that can be answered yes or no!!!
stop with the ole soft shoe and answer the dang question!!!
nice quote...
do you think it to be so???
________________________
You asked for my thoughts which have been provided. You now have three options: agree; disagree; or ignore them.
03 Apr 15
Originally posted by PonderableMaybe it's a poor translation then that renders the Herman Hesse pretentious claptrap. 🙂
However it happens that we dislike persons (and I will look up the original quaote sionce I think that "hate" is probably not correct translated), and we wonder why, and the the quote is quite correct. I have often observed that people can't stand their own weaknesses in others.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbySomething other than waffle would be a more interesting response from you. If someone hates a man that would rape and impregnate his daughter, throw acid in a woman's face, deliberately poison his neighbours, or traffic teenage girls as sex workers, and then you have Herman Hesse trotting out some blithe nonsense like "If you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself", how are the daughter-rape-impregnation, acid-poison-vengeance, and child-sex-trafficker things "part" of the person who hates the perpetrator and the perpetration of these deeds?
The first question is what did Hesse mean by "part of yourself". which appears to be an implied reference to an individual's norms and standards of morality or conscience. If respect for the person and property and freedom of others is part of these standards, violations such as rape or murder or theft or refusal to recognize the freedom of others would ...[text shortened]... se standards are not present, then the same violations wouldn't "disturb" that same individual.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou may well feel "hated" whenever you are "criticized" Grampy Bobby, but you simply cannot conflate the meaning of "criticize" and "hate", not in conventional English. They are not synonyms.
Substituting the word "criticize" for "hate" in the same quote: "If you [criticize] a person, you [criticize] something in him that is part of yourself. What isn't part of ourselves doesn't disturb us." (because you're already aware of and recognize these shortcomings in yourself) would make literal sense without speculation over his meaning of "part of yourself".
03 Apr 15
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou would characterize hating daughter rape, child/sex trafficking, revenge murder/attacks and the like as "pettiness"?
...Courage to see reality steady and to see it whole requires vision and grace under fire, not the brain melt pettiness of allowing hate to fixate on other people.