19 Feb 08
1 edit
The post that was quoted here has been removedAs you know, I'm a bit skeptic of this documentation. I think that laboratory models cannot perfectly mimic the social interactions of rabbits. Particularly civilized ones, where the cultural capital is an important variable, yet unquantifiable.
Why aren't there giant affordable chickens, as big as elephants? What is the genetic differences that lead to this historical inconsistencies?
19 Feb 08
The post that was quoted here has been removedBut it's only identifiable as a residue!* How can you claim for sure that this is objectifiable cultural capital? It could be anything else that these models fail to identify!
*That is, all that is left beyond the quantifiable explanatory variables (mainly financial and rabbit capital).
You know as well as I do that the reason that giant affordable chickens is not freely available is due to nuclear fur. To suggest otherwise is disingenuous.
Since the rapid development of nuclear fur was intimately connected to the absence of giant affordable chickens, I don't know how you can make that claim. Which came first? The rabbit or the chicken? These questions have no epistemological sense.
