- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
@very-rusty saidMaybe get your facts straight though before calling people liars.
I hadn't planned on apologizing goad.
That is why he made the name, you should be laughing about it. 😉 😛
-VR
@very-rusty saidWait, let me get this straight...
I hadn't planned on apologizing goad.
That is why he made the name, you should be laughing about it. 😉 😛
-VR
He made the name so he could confuse you?
Ok, I'll buy that.
@suzianne saidOK you buy it, and while you're doing your transaction stop stalking me! 😛 😉
Wait, let me get this straight...
He made the name so he could confuse you?
Ok, I'll buy that.
7 of your last 15 posts were all directed at me Suzie Q. You're close to being a stalker in my opinion.
-VR
- Joined
- 14 Feb 09
- Moves
- 12541
14 Apr 21
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou have a 'no mustache' policy?
Stick to one account (one that has its own legs) lose the mustache, clean up your act, and who knows...
@very-rusty saidWho's stalking whom?
OK you buy it, and while you're doing your transaction stop stalking me! 😛 😉
7 of your last 15 posts were all directed at me Suzie Q. You're close to being a stalker in my opinion.
-VR
Normal people don't go checking who I've been writing posts to.
@suzianne saidVery Rusty has a lamentable habit of replying to seemingly almost everybody's posts on seemingly almost every thread. That's not really stalking.
Who's stalking whom?
You, on the other hand, appear to spend quite a bit of time replying to Very Rusty's posts despite the fact that, rather like him, you often have nothing much to say to him aside from dreary putdowns and "banter".
As dull as he can be, and despite the odd flashes of malice, he very often comes across as having a bit more generosity of spirit than you do.
He posts in a rather mindlessly boring way much of the time, but you seem a bit fixated on him and traipse around looking for posts by him to reply to and you seem to be always tying to say scornful things [something he cannot be accusedof].
This means your pattern of posting CAN be characterized as stalking, I think.
This answers your "Who's stalking whom?" question.
@fmf saidZING!
Very Rusty has a lamentable habit of replying to seemingly almost everybody's posts on seemingly almost every thread. That's not really stalking.
You, on the other hand, appear to spend quite a bit of time replying to Very Rusty's posts despite the fact that, rather like him, you often have nothing much to say to him aside from dreary putdowns and "banter".
As dull as he ...[text shortened]... ng CAN be characterized as stalking, I think.
This answers your "Who's stalking whom?" question.
@very-musty saidIt is odd isn’t it.
Stop fighting.
Ghost of a duke creates a club for the specific purpose of drawing a core of main posters away from the General Forum to avoid the dripping tap posting of Very Rusty, and then he (and of course Suzianne) spend a large amount of their efforts responding to as many Very Rusty posts as they can.
What also seems to be a little odd is that despite the almost daily complaints about Very Rusty’s posting, it is only myself and one other poster here, FMF, who comment on this rather incongruent behaviour. It’s almost as if other posters lend their tacit approval as though they were all in a group together or something.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
@very-musty saidNow listen very carefully. There are only five valid reasons why a chap would grow a moustache. One. He has some irregularity with his upper lip which he wishes to conceal. Two. The girl he has been infatuated with since puberty has an inexplicable fetish for male facial hair and will not date anybody lacking such an appendage. Three. Despite being forty-two he has the face of a fourteen-year-old and desperately wants to be taken seriously at the approaching job interview. Four. He has invented a time machine and is going back to the 1970s. Five. He is quite mad.
You have a 'no mustache' policy?
- Joined
- 14 Feb 09
- Moves
- 12541
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
The time machine isn't complete yet.
I still need 3 gorgandle spheres 🤔
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
@very-musty saidBut you've mastered the electromagnetic force and mass-energy equivalence, simultaneously resolving the Pauli Exclusion Principle that prohibits two identical fermions from sharing the same quantum state?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
The time machine isn't complete yet.
I still need 3 gorgandle spheres 🤔
- Joined
- 14 Feb 09
- Moves
- 12541
@ghost-of-a-duke saidElementary dear Watson 🤔
But you've mastered the electromagnetic force and mass-energy equivalence, simultaneously resolving the Pauli Exclusion Principle that prohibits two identical fermions from sharing the same quantum state?