07 Mar 09
Originally posted by black beetleJust to go back to the beginning, relatively. What if your evaluation is based upon delusion and, as I wrote later, pre-conceived ideas that may be totally inaccurate because they are untested or formulated early in life. Isn't your evaluation dangerous then? Just a Q 😉
By using the evaluation of the mind -Philosophy and Science, my dear mikelom; nice thread this one of yours, congrats🙂
07 Mar 09
Originally posted by mikelomIn such a case the product/ conclusion/ theory have not derive due to the evaluation of the mind; the evaluation of the mind is a standard procedure that unables the Human to avoid delusions; therefore it is enough to be aware of what you know and of what you ignore. Everything else follows😵
Just to go back to the beginning, relatively. What if your evaluation is based upon delusion and, as I wrote later, pre-conceived ideas that may be totally inaccurate because they are untested or formulated early in life. Isn't your evaluation dangerous then? Just a Q 😉
07 Mar 09
Originally posted by black beetleSeems that good old boy Bill Henley was playing his 'Invictus' version of the same game, way back when, when you were still a pup. Yes?
I don't play nobody's game; I do not play Clifford's game, your game, Jesus Game, Muhhamed's game, Socrates' game, Bobby's game. Whatever Clifford said is a product of his brain. I am not forced to bow to anybody's mental projections in case these projections are against my Intelligence.
I always create my own rules😵
😉
07 Mar 09
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyOh, this miserable atheist black beetle is an insufferable ignorant dolt!
Seems that good old boy Bill Henley was playing his 'Invictus' version of the same game, way back when, when you were still a pup. Yes?
😉
Who is that illustrious Henley and his noble "Invictus"?
😵
07 Mar 09
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby...for, the Henley who said that he is the master of his fate and the captain of his soul was named Ernest. Who is the mighty Billy?
Seems that good old boy Bill Henley was playing his 'Invictus' version of the same game, way back when, when you were still a pup. Yes?
😉
😵
07 Mar 09
2 edits
Originally posted by black beetleWilliam Ernest Henley (1849-1903)... affectionately aka Bill in Bobby's and Billy in Beetle's respective books.
...for, the Henley who said that he is the master of his fate and the captain of his soul was named Ernest. Who is the mighty Billy?
😵
😀
By the way, beginning to wonder what if any external authority 'The You' typically accepts other than the law of gravity and the rules of chess.
07 Mar 09
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI accept every rule that is not against my Intelligence, Bobby my friend😵
William Ernest Henley (1849-1903)... affectionately aka Bill in Bobby's and Billy in Beetle's respective books.
😀
By the way, beginning to wonder what if any external authority 'The You' typically accepts other than the law of gravity and the rules of chess.
07 Mar 09
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyAnd what exactly is "objective knowledge"? There is just Knowledge, based on Philosophy and scientific finds and evidence, and there is constant evolution of this Knowledge of ours. Our Knowledge of yesterday becomes the myth of our Today😵
Wondering what 'The You' regards as the ultimate source of objective knowledge.
😉
07 Mar 09
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyBut, to be frank, this Silent Me inside me is indifferent to the "this and that" of the Human -and Human I am, Human I remain, I am not better or worst than anybody.
Wondering what 'The You' regards as the ultimate source of objective knowledge.
😉
This Silent Me is just the emanation of Life projected in myself, however you see solely my thoughts and my body; and I cannot reach this Silent Me with my mind, and I cannot show it to you. However I can see whether or not somebody is aware of this or not.
Nothing Holy😵
07 Mar 09
2 edits
Originally posted by black beetleJust the title of a book by Popper... "Objective Knowledge (An Evolutionary Approach)", Karl Popper, Oxford University Press, 1972.
And what exactly is "objective knowledge"? There is just Knowledge, based on Philosophy and scientific finds and evidence, and there is constant evolution of this Knowledge of ours. Our Knowledge of yesterday becomes the myth of our Today😵
07 Mar 09
1 edit
Originally posted by black beetleBelieve 'holy' and 'holiness' are outmoded and anachronistic terms. Holiness = justice and righteousness or in 2009 speech... integrity.
But, to be frank, this Silent Me inside me is indifferent to the "this and that" of the Human -and Human I am, Human I remain, I am not better or worst than anybody.
This Silent Me is just the emanation of Life projected in myself, however you see solely my thoughts and my body; and I cannot reach this Silent Me with my mind, and I cannot show it to you. However I can see whether or not somebody is aware of this or not.
Nothing Holy😵