Originally posted by StarValleyWybookworm is right to have a very close look at this arguement
Ok. My logical argument is that there are good and evil in the world. Those who are "defenseless" are to be protected at "all cost". Those who "have killed" or "will kill" for a cause are to be destroyed. Didn't take long to answer cause I've thought of it for fifty years.
Your turn.
anticipating your response... as per Patton... "A Cause that is not our Cause is bullshit!"
(SVW were you sober?)
it is the most common/powerful justification for all sorts of violence - one problem i see is that the defenseless and the killers are likely to be the same. just because you have a powerful ability to kill does not mean that another cannot kill you, paranoidly pulling the trigger ASAP.
similarly as your reference to patton suggests - the "good and evil" are really just the "us and them".