one word
can you guess what it is?
hint: this is a phenomenological existential question. the rules are that the word must appear in every posting to be valid. thus, can the absence of the word so clearly alluded to be considered a constitutional tacit utterance of the word?
this posting is more interesting than it first appears
Originally posted by gareth cobbWhen He Explained Everything Like Bob Attempted, Running Rampant Over Words, does that count?
legally your fine,due to combining the letters of your post. In the spirit of simplicity of the wheelbarrow game and phenomenological existentialism it is impossible to know what word you were alluding to .