04 Feb 07
Originally posted by RookRAKShe didn't kill it. Go back and look. It doesn't look dead to me....
Well technically that is true. But sadly in a moment of insanity she did kill it just short of its birthday. Poor thread ...
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=25715&page=509
04 Feb 07
Originally posted by The PlumberYou didn't read the fine print. Early on in the thread it was decided that "deadness" results from 48 hours without a post. Otherwise you could never really declare any thread dead.
She didn't kill it. Go back and look. It doesn't look dead to me....
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=25715&page=509
05 Feb 07
1 edit
Originally posted by RookRAKAs the original definer of this thread and the accumulator of the original dead-thread statistics, my definition of "dead" is what counts. It is the definition that I used when I created the thread. That definition was, as of the creation date (June 29) all threads whose last post was in the previous month (May). Hence, to qualify as truly dead, a mere 48 hours of inactivity is insufficient; at least 4 weeks is required.
You didn't read the fine print. Early on in the thread it was decided that "deadness" results from 48 hours without a post. Otherwise you could never really declare any thread dead.
Long live the dead thread!