Too good people

Originally posted by Natsia
I thought you were in the process of quitting?

I guess I am self-enabling today. 😞

Originally posted by wagrro
just because they didn't find any human dan in your basement doesn't mean they wont find any human tom, dick or harry - you canabilistic dyslexic

HEY! Slysdexics are teople, poo!

Originally posted by dizzyfingers
HEY! Slysdexics are teople, poo!

there is a difference between being dyslexic and just having bad aim - i checked up on you and see you are not registered with the DNA ( DNA = National Association of Dyslexics )

Originally posted by wagrro
there is a difference between being dyslexic and just having bad aim - i checked up on you and see you are not registered with the DNA ( DNA = National Association of Dyslexics )

They're ganging up on us! To battle! Dyslexics of the world - UNTIE!

Originally posted by Natsia
I thought you were in the process of quitting?

Key words are: "in the process of". My uncle and aunt both went through that in order to have a baby-friendly household, as well as cutting back on alcohol, and it was no walk in the park for them.

Back to the topic...
.........never mind...I got nothing. 😕

K-

Originally posted by ivan2908
What is wrong with people that seem too good to be true. Nice, good, altruistic, empatic, inteligent, knowledgeable, fun, trustable, succesfull, without single visible flaw in any aspect of their character ?

Now, there is some nasty catch, isn't it ?

No

Originally posted by YEAH BOY
No

No ?

Originally posted by ivan2908
What is wrong with people that seem too good to be true. Nice, good, altruistic, empatic, inteligent, knowledgeable, fun, trustable, succesfull, without single visible flaw in any aspect of their character ?

Now, there is some nasty catch, isn't it ?

Why do you assume there must be a flaw in the person. Why do you assume there must be a failing?


Why can't someone just know the difference between right and wrong and act accordingly all the time? Why do they have to give in to sin in order to be considered normal?

You see the obvious flaw in your characterization question don't you? It's not a question of whether they have any flaws in their character....it's a question of whether or not YOU see any flaws in their character.

"There is no flaw in their character so therefore there MUST be a flaw in their character"?.....what kind of circuitous logic is that??

Originally posted by Palynka
The police have already concluded that there were no traces of human dna in my basement.

Ha you're an alien, I knew it!