Originally posted by josephwSo, obviously you did cite James 4:4 in order to be critical of a fellow Christian. Pretty plain speech, in action, would have had you answer a plain "yes" earlier on the previous page.
Was it that complicated? My speech is pretty plain isn't it? What's your point?
13 Mar 16
Originally posted by FMFThe answer is no. I was not being critical about an individual's person, but as I explained, their behavior. Big difference. Plainly a difference you're not able to comprehend.
So, obviously you [b]did cite James 4:4 in order to be critical of a fellow Christian. Pretty plain speech, in action, would have had you answer a plain "yes" earlier on the previous page.[/b]
13 Mar 16
Originally posted by josephwI am able to comprehend what you are saying here. Whichever way you parse it, you are wriggling. 😉
The answer is no. I was not being critical about an individual's person, but as I explained, their behavior. Big difference. Plainly a difference you're not able to comprehend.
13 Mar 16
Originally posted by josephwIf your citing of a Bible verse to score points in the midst of some General Forum banter results in you wriggling and resorting to sophistry, then you really ought to reflect on whether you are using your holy scriptures in a decent and appropriate way. 😉
Everyone wriggles a little. It's hard to say everything exactly the right way. If we could there'd be no debate. 😉
14 Mar 16
Originally posted by josephwSo am I not permitted the same latitude which you provide yourself, whereby I can criticise Grampy Bobby's behaviour?
The answer is no. I was not being critical about an individual's person, but as I explained, their behavior. Big difference. Plainly a difference you're not able to comprehend.